The Human
Rights Act’s 1998 UK Article 4: Freedom from slavery and forced labour Demeanour Article 4 protects your
right not to be held in slavery or servitude, or made to do forced labour Slavery is
when someone actually owns you like a piece of property. Servitude
is similar to slavery - you might live on the person’s premises, work for
them and be unable to leave, but they don’t own you. Are there any restrictions to this right? Your right to be protected against slavery and
servitude is absolute, which means it can never be restricted. The right relating to forced labour is also
absolute. However, it does not apply to work that: you have to do as part of a prison or community
sentence the government requires you to do in a state of
emergency, such as after a natural or man-made disaster, and is part of normal civic obligations, like jury
service. What the law says. Article 4: Prohibition of slavery
and forced labour 1.
No one shall be held in slavery or servitude. 2.
No one shall be required to perform forced or
compulsory labour. 3.
For the purpose of this Article the term ‘forced
or compulsory labour’ shall not include: any work required to be done in the ordinary
course of detention imposed according to the provisions of Article 5 of this
Convention or during conditional release from such detention any service of a military character or, in case
of conscientious any service exacted in case of an emergency or
calamity threatening the life or well-being of the community, or any work or service which forms part of normal
civic obligations. Example case - Siliadin
v France [2005] A 15-year-old girl was brought to France from
Togo by ‘Mrs D’, who paid for her journey but then confiscated her passport.
It was agreed that the girl would work for Mrs D until she had paid back her
air fare, but after a few months she was ‘lent’ to another couple. They
forced her to work 15 hours a day, seven days a week with no pay, no
holidays, no identity documents and without authorisation of her immigration
status. The girl wore second-hand clothes and did not have her own room. The
authorities intervened when made aware of the situation, but slavery and
servitude were not a specific criminal offence in France at that time. The
European Court of Human Rights held that the girl had
been kept in servitude and that France had breached its positive
obligations under the prohibition of slavery and forced labour. This was
because French law had not given the girl specific and effective protection. (Case summary taken from ‘Human rights, human
lives: a guide to the Human Rights Act for public authorities. Download
the publication for more examples and legal case studies that show how human
rights work in practice.) |