Page 469 - tmp
P. 469

Where an internal alarm is sounding and a breach of the notice has been witnessed a warrant is required to gain
           access to the property in order to silence the alarm and abate the nuisance.

           Where it is intended that the noise and nuisance team will be undertaking a seizure of noise making equipment
           from a property, it is likely that entry would be refused if attending at the property without a warrant. Such
           action would then make the occupiers aware of the intention to seize noise making equipment, with the potential
           for items to be removed from the property before officers are able to return with a warrant.

           The officer should attend at the court number given or if not given a court number go to the listings office to find
           the relevant court number. Once in court the officer should present only the application and the 3 warrants to the
           court clerk. The officer should have the abatement notice, OOH reports, witness statements and any other
           relevant information in case they are requested by the court. Proceedings will be as follows;
            The officer will be sworn in and will then present the application.
             The magistrate will then ask any questions they feel are relevant.
             If the warrant is granted all 3 copies of the warrant will be signed.
            The noise and nuisance team keep the applicant’s copy.
             The occupier’s copy is left at the seizure/alarm address once the works have been carried out.

           The court’s copy is returned to the court after the seizure/alarm silencing has taken place with the second page of
           the warrant completed.

           Seizing Noise Equipment (Seizures): -

           The Council’s principal power to seize noise equipment is contained in section 81(3) of the Environmental
           Protection Act 1990. The Act states: ‘Where an abatement notice has not been complied with the local authority
           may, whether or not they take proceedings for an offence under section 80(4), abate the nuisance and do
           whatever may be necessary in execution of the notice’

           Following a breach of an Abatement Notice the case officer will discuss with the noise and nuisance team
           Supervisors/Managers as to whether it is appropriate to send a PACE letter (refer to section 10.0) to the person
           on whom the notice was served or a letter of intention to prosecute advising that legal proceedings are being
           considered.

           The applicant is now left with the understanding that the Antisocial Behaviour Order (ASBO) application was
           created in the understanding that by pc Steve Elsmore  and other officers acting in such a manner of the claims
           listed within this document and or by allowing other officers to use his id logging to gain such wrongful and
           illegal convections they did do so upon oath to the legal services, new Scotland yard London sw1h bog
           Reference number L/107087/sag and stated that they was sure that the defendant was responsible for the acts to
           which particulars had been given,  in respect to the complaints made and developed by them self’s which are all
           concealed within the Antisocial Behaviour Order (ASBO) application, in turn knowingly and deliberately while
           intentionally misusing his or hers and their powers of conduct, while and with complete disregard for law and
           associated regulations, to aid in a manner to which was reckless and caused extreme disregard for the applicants
           and other human life’s, creating a breach of many human rights as some are listed within this document in
           accordance towards the relevant issues of concern in regards to accountably breaches. The rights to respect for
           each person(s) Human rights “Articles” are of fundamental importance. Any invasion of the rights must be
           strongly justified.

           All “public authorities” for the purposes of the Human Rights Act 1998, are directly subject to the legal
           obligation imposed by section 6 of that Act to act compatibly with Convention rights, the state can not discharge
           its obligations under ECHR Article 8 in relation to the retention and storage of data.

           ASBO is disproportionate: -

           The applicant states that the Antisocial Behaviour Order (ASBO) is disproportionate and it prevents him from
           engaging in lawful business.  The Antisocial Behaviour Order (ASBO) prevents the applicant from applying for
           licences to hold events within each local council’s boroughs, without alerting each individual council of the

                                                                                                             28
                                                                 461
   464   465   466   467   468   469   470   471   472