Page 390 - tmp

From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 17 December 2013 21:16
To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD'
Subject: RE: FW: Your Ref 1849692 (Our Ref SLCGC/NJD/5005393) Re: Simon Cordell
Hi Josey

I told them that Simon was arrested due to DNA being found at the warehouse and has been charged and it is
going to crown court so yes they are aware Simon was arrested for the building as I told him Simon is getting
done for all of the damages, and it seems from the files they have linked both cases of the 16 Feb 2013 and the
04 May 2013, but Simon was not charged with the case from the 16 Feb 2013 only with the case from the 04
May 2013. And that Simon was not there on the 16 Feb 2013 and can prove this.

I have even told them that 4 people were arrested on 16 Feb 2013 from what I can tell they don’t seem to have
the information as to even the person in the police who was dealing with the case so it seems that Mr Patel is
not telling the insurance company a lot of the things they should know as when I was telling him about things in
the case he seemed to be very shocked and un aware of a lot of the things for Feb 2013 and May 2013.

But yes he is very aware that Simon was arrested and that’s why I made the call when I saw they had joined the
insurance claim under one case for both dates.

Lorraine

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [mailto:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]
Sent: 17 December 2013 20:09
To: Lorraine Cordell
Subject: Re:FW: Your Ref 1849692 (Our Ref SLCGC/NJD/5005393) Re: Simon Cordell

Hi Lorraine

Are the insurance company aware that Simon is awaiting trial for burglary. I assume you have
disclosed this to them. I would have to disclose this fact to them before requesting information and
informer to do this I would require Simon's signed written consent.

The next stage is getting the case and listed for mention.

Any questions please email me direct.

Thanks

Josephine

On Dec 17, 2013 5:10 PM, "Lorraine Cordell" <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
Hi josey

This is the manager now dealing with the insurance claim Mr Patel put in for
the building that the party was in.

He is setting up a meeting with Mr Patel asking him to sign a form that
would allow him to disclose any information to any person that has cause to
see the claim. But not telling Mr Patel that he has spoke to us or would
like a meeting with us.

He said some other things also about the claim Mr Patel put in, he said that
in Feb 2013 he did put a claim in and was asked by the insurance to do some
things which Mr Patel did not do so the insurance closed the claim down and
Mr Patel did not do anything else with that claim to say he wanted to keep

368