Page 464 - tmp

There was a break down before in this case as you are aware and I dropped the complaint.

Josey I have used you as a solicitor for many years and don’t just look at you as a solicitor you are a friend of
the family’s.

All I want is for my case to be dealt with in a correct manner, which will lead me to have a speedy and fair
trial, and I don’t want to feel like I am being punished for a crime that I have not been convicted of.

And I feel with the statement from Nikki Diamond that would show somewhat to Mr Patel ways in how he has
dealt with his insurance case in this matter that clearly is not correct all ready.

Could you please email back at the points that have been included in this email, and if you feel I am wrong on
any points or the way in which I am feeling.

Simon

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [mailto:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]
Sent: 02 February 2014 14:31
To: too smooth; Lorraine Cordell
Subject: Simon Cordell ­ application to transfer legal representation

Simon

Further to your telephone conversation with me today during which you have accused me of not
representing you correctly and not defending your case properly you leave me with little choice but
to list the case at Woolwich Crown Court in order that your legal representation order can be
revoked.

I am cancelling your 2pm confernece with me for Tuesday 4th February 2014.

I am not prepared to be subjected to threats about you blackening my name over Facebook. I work
very hard for all my clients and my track record as a Criminal Defence Solicitors attests to that.

I have represented you since you were a juvenile to the best of my abilities and I have never not
defended a client properly or tried my best for my client.

You stated that during the telephone conversation that the Judge asked you to change your solicitors
at the last bail hearing on Christmas Eve. As you are aware I was on annual leave from 23rd
December 2013. I made the bail variation as requested and you were not happy as the court did not
suspend your curfew. That is the simple fact of the matter here. You also stated that during a
conference with Jemi, the barrister that I appointed for you that he also advised you that I was a
442