Page 473 - tmp

From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 03 February 2014 18:51
To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD'
Subject: RE: Simon Cordell - application to transfer legal representation

Hi Josey

Thank you for the reply to Simon’s email, Simon has asked me to write this email for him.
The section of my email that was sent to you yesterday that address Jemi and the meeting we had come from my friend
Katie who did attend the meeting with Jemi with me, so new what was said and I used her words as to what she heard at
the meeting as to what Jemi said to me.
If needed Katie could confirm this so can my mum as she was the one writing the email for me that was sent yesterday.

Could you also please send me a copy as to what you have sent over to Jemi by email and his reply to your email?
I agree the case is now listed for the warned list for the week commencing 30th June 2014.

As you are aware on the 19/12/2013 when my mum got the email from you about my case about the application that was
put to the court that day, when my mum got the email she was very worried due to the date for the listing for the new trial
date, so she herself called you before she had even showed me the email. She knew the new trial date would cause a delay
in my case by 6 months or more.
she asked you some things on the phone on the 19/01/2014 one being if we got the information from the crown could the
date of the 30/06/2014 be taken sooner.
You replied once we get the information form the crown and Third-Party Disclosure it could be listed back in court and
there maybe was a chance to being the date forward for the hearing, this is the information she told me.
It is this that is upsetting me so much as the longer it takes to put the applications into the court the longer it will take to get
the information that is needed in my case.

As you know I am on bail conditions that have stopped me doing anything for my business that I have been setting up for
many years now. In fact, I have lost a lot of business due to the bail conditions I am on.
I do not think it is right that a judge to say to me that I can sub contract my business out, I am not talking here a small
amount of money for my sound system or any of my equipment, if it was lost or damaged it could take a long time in
which to recover the costs. This is why when my equipment is hired, I also go with it due to me being able to look after it
and make sure they don’t red line my equipment or it is damage or taken, I myself take care of it.
And I do feel my human rights are being violated by the court and crown not allowing me to do my work.
The longer it takes this case to go to court for trial is the longer my business cannot run this is why I am so upset that
things are not being put in on time to the court. I have spent many years getting to where I am today within my business
and due to this case, my business is has suffered.
Yes, I agree my case is in the warned list for the week of the 30/06/2014 but would like the information well before this
date so that maybe the trial can be taken forward.
I would also like it sooner than later so the facts as to how Mr Patel has done this can be shown to the crown.

As for what I said at my home and at police station is not the issue here I knows what I said and was being honest as I did
not think I had done anything wrong. I did buy the items from Mohammed in good faith.

For it to have been a job lot of 5 of each or just 1 gazebo, and 1 chair which was found at my address I think the police
would have taken the same said outcome to this case. They wanted someone for this case and I was that person.
This can be shown by any information we have asked for not being given they still have not even given the CAD reports
for that day in truth that there were other police at the scene and let me in the building knowing I was there to hire my
sound system for a private party that night as I explained this to them when I got there. Let alone how many times they
attended the building on that evening even down to the council attending with the police due to noise.
There is also the case as to when I turned up at the building and the police was already there, how is it when they did their
checks, they did not see that a Burglary had happened on that building on the 16/02/2013 and let us

451