Page 514 - tmp

From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 12 February 2014 17:25
To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD'
Subject: RE: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on
Hi Josey

Simon said thank you.

Lorraine

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [mailto:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]
Sent: 12 February 2014 15:04
To: Lorraine Cordell
Subject: Re: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on

Hi Lorraine

I have just returned from lunch. Tell Simon that is fine. I do not want to fall out with either him or
you. He is hard work but I am still willing to represent him.

Regards

Josephine

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
Hi Josey

Thank you for the update I understand now as to the section 35. Simon has just got here as he is due to
have a meeting at 3pm today with a next solicitor; he has read the emails and asked me to write this to
you.

If you are still willing represent him then he is fine with this, as he was only upset due to him
believing things was not being done in time and him believing this would impact his life for longer.
As he said the other day he is sorry for the disagreement that happened on the phone.

If you could let him know how you feel about this before 14.30 he would be grateful.

Simon / Lorraine

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [mailto:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]
Sent: 12 February 2014 12:17
To: Lorraine Cordell
Subject: Re: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on

Hi Lorraine

Trevor Allway has indicated that he will view a section 35 request favourably. If he agrees that we
satisfy the criteria of section 35 then we will not have to resort to Third Party Disclosure as he should
disclose. We may still have to do Third Party disclosure if he redacts information that may be
relevant. A decision cannot be made on this until we receive either (a) the file from the insurance
company or (b) the insurance company is unwilling to disclose in which case Third party Disclosure
492