Page 475 - tmp

8/6/2017 Print
th
Attended venue on the 7 alone – did look @ Intel before attending.
Officer did not speak to any of the owner’s.
Did not know D was with Tyrone Benjamin.
WINTNESS 3 – PC Skinner – Bundle Tabs 12 of 13 Lead
Statement 1 Tab 13
th
On the 7 Duty officer + walked in to Estate and saw a van but did not recognise van.
He saw D however who admitted he was the organiser of the rave.
Statement 2 Tab 12
Youths were committing shop lifting out of the petrol station.
I had to call for reserve intervention.
I arrested D and people dispersed and D was realised.
Rave did not take place.
No dought the rave would have continued had he not arrested D.
DEF XEX.
19 TH July event @ Carpet right company building was occupied.
Saw speakers – Intel were loading equipment indoors.
Details of van taken but was not D.
Carpet right was padlock round metal barrier.
Other car park had a front entrance.
I was senior officer attending the venue.
Latter on I instructed the sergeant to contact the owners.
I latter see the defendant getting out the van.
I can’t remember that, I may have updated others in relation to D getting out of van. But I may or may not have updated the system.
th
On the 7 June D made admissions to me not aware of squatters.
Met XEX
Refers to statement on page 76
Witness Pc Edgoose – R.O 12:14pm EIC Read
Statement 21
th
Incident of 24 July:
I was in a vehicle that stopped D’s Vehicle.
No threat to break defendant’s window (ok)
It was all about drug issues.
Witness VI – Pc King 12:28pm EIC
Tab 15/16

R V CORDELL
3
Statement Page 41
Officer has only met D once before.
D has all ways been polite.
Has never had any problem with the defendant.
D was rely eloquent of clearly knows the how.
Witness Pc Ames – Acting sergeant – R.O -12:46 Pm EIC
DEF XEX
Event was out doors.
Saw sound equipment substance speakers box.
Approximately the size of witness box, but could not remember really as he was distracted by people.
No further questions.
Witness – Pc Elsmore – R.O – 14:10 EIC
Tab 6 – pg
DEF XEX
The Council is confused that of the PNC info of the statements, Council adds no probationary value of info Re: Witness being “afraid of
D” Which he puts down to the way he worded, but he meant that people actually are afraid of possibly giving evidence in court.
DEF
Counsel argues that officers statement is designed to cause on evidence reaction of this of no value and speculatory in nature.
DJ
How many calls from public did police receive?
Witness
In excess of 15 calls – how many to the same venue and not other address.
Officer does not know the number of callers in relation to each of these occasions.
On page 15 – Allegations re: Mill marsh Lane, evidence from officer not first hand – relied on cads and other Intel.
Query Re:”3 massive nitrous tanks”
DJ
Were did you get such info officer
Witness

about:blank 2/10
2453