Page 507 - tmp

8/6/2017 Print

Subject: RE: I sent this to Josie
From: Lorraine Cordell (lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk)

To: re_wired@ymail.com;
Date: Friday, 9 September 2016, 9:55

Simon when i opened the email this is how it come out i could not read it so had to go to your email and save to pdf

not sure if it will come out to Josey like the below or not.

From: Rewired Rewired [mailto:re_wired@ymail.com]
Sent: 08 September 2016 23:12
To: Lorraine Cordell
Subject: I sent this to Josie

Dear Josie I do not understand why it is not in my best interests for you to serve the suggested amendments that I made in relation
towards the letter that you proposed sending to Ms Sally Gilchrist. The reason I do not understand is because: 1. Mr Morris advice on
4th April 2016 was the same as what I had explained to yourself when
the case had started dated 12th September 2014 as received on
receipt by yourself and by method of
email’s and them email’s referred to the respondent's
application of an Asbo order quoting “That a case should not rely solely on
hearsay” as mine seems to do by the police
officer’s. Most of the hearsay in any case is reported to be third party and
therefore carry less weight in any case. 2. I want to show the true facts about the case
as I am the one who is suffering because of untrue cut
and paste facts that represent the basics of the respondent's case
and that singed evidence being off fabricated police
statements, as detailed in the amendments towards your letter to Sally Gilchrist,
whom is already in receipt of such evidence but refuses to act upon such
intelligence in accordance of the law and you advise me to ignore this even low
I suffer. 3. I understand that a lot of the matters that should be dealt with
at court will be. 4. I still argue for a speedy and fair
trial: and feel that when a judge asks the respondent to reply by a set date
such as the 1/08/2016 as the judge HHJ PAWLAK has ordered to happen it should.
5. The respondent should do so within the time duration as dated 01/09/2016 and
agreed with the judge and then
received with the correct response, as has not happened. 6. I have been
awaiting the reply since 00/02/2016 from an ongoing civil application that is
dated 13th August 2014 so to be able to have a fair trial. 7. After waiting on
the 01/-9-2016 with no response I waited till the 2/09/2016 and
telephoned the respondent I spoke with a lady called sally gill Hurst, she
states that she has served some paperwork to my solicitor's at the
beginning of august a month prior, after finishing our conversation I contacted
my solicitor she explained to me that she was away on holiday and that I must
wait till she gets back on the 6th September 2016. 8. I again put the phone
down and called my solicitor firm's office to see if any paperwork had
been served to be told no. 9. On the 8TH August I spoke with my mother who
explained to me that she had been in contact with my solicitor and that I would
about:blank 1/4
2485