Page 517 - tmp

8/6/2017 Print
Hi Josephine

Please find attached the document as requested.

Please be advised that as I no longer represent Mr Cordell, this document does not contain information based on
what his current instructions are as between yourself and his barrister. This document was prepared for a specific
purpose to deal with a response to HHJ Pawlak's letter. After consulting the client for some length of time, he
informed both you and I that he did not wish for this document to be handed up. Instead as you remember and
against my firm advice, he asked me to hand up his own typed document which the Judge then read.

I am not sure for which purpose the client wishes to use this document now but it may be that his barrister will
want to advise him as to the best course of action and particularly in terms of any hearsay applications. You will
remember that these have been dealt with already and the Judge allowed the hearsay applications by the Crown.

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you require any further information,

Regards

Andrew

-----Original Message-----
From: JOSEPHINE WARD [josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2016 01:14 PM GMT Standard Time
To: Morris, Andrew (LAA); Lorraine Cordell
Subject: Fwd: Simon Cordell vase

Dear Andrew

I am forwarding you an email received from Simon Cordell and his mother in which they are requesting the
document that you prepared opposing the introduction of the hearsay evidence. I explained that Simon rejected
this document on 4th April 2016 and would not allow this to be served on the Court or Respondent. I also
explained that he was provided with a copy of this document and he is stating that this document was handed
back to you and he now wants a copy of the document.

Can you please email me across the document that you prepared so that Mr Cordell can have this.

Thank you for your kind assistance in this matter.

Yours sincerely

Josephine Ward

about:blank 2/4
2495