Page 527 - tmp

8/6/2017 Print

Simon

Please accept this email as written confirmation that I am no longer prepared to represent you. I am satisfied
that there has been a complete breakdown in solicitor / client relationship. I also have concerns as to your
capacity to follow and participate in the appeal proceedings.

You are unwilling or incapable of listening to advice. You have questioned my professional and personal
integrity. I have represented you for a very long time and continued to represent you in these proceedings
because of the regard and respect that I have for your mother.

In April 2016 I requested that you be assessed by a Psychiatrist or give me access to your medical notes which
you refused to do. You threatened to blacken my name on the Internet if I raised the issue again. You were
recently sectioned in St Anne's hospital and you challenged that section and were released. I believe that you
are not able to listen to advice. I believe that you are incapable of participating in proceedings. You insist on
arguing points that are irrelevant and detrimental to your case. You do not allow the conferences to move on.

The allegation against you simply is that you organised raves / parties that caused antisocial or had the potential
to cause anti social behaviour. See schedule forwarded to you on Friday. All the matters alleged you have
already provided instructions and challenges to the allegations. Put as simply as possible you deny organising,
providing sound equipment or sourcing premises for the purposes of holding raves / Parties. You challenged
whether the events in question are illegal raves as trespass is not present. This argument has no bearing on your
case as you deny and have repeatedly denied sourcing premises, providing equipment or organising any of the
events with the exception of Mill Marsh Lane which you accept you were present for a small birthday party
gathering (again no witness statement / witness details provided)

I have advised you that it is my view that regardless of whether Progress Way was a private party (LAPSO
loophole) or a rave the bottom line is that anti social behaviour was caused due to noise nuisance / disorderly
conduct.

You seek to use the appeal proceedings to challenge the law by arguing that any person living in a commercial
building under a LAPSO notice can hold moving in parties. They are not holding a rave as trespass is not
present but they are causing anti social behaviour to neighbouring residents when they hold events that cause
extreme noise etc. On no occasion during your instructions did you say that you were living on the premises,
nor did you state that your sound system had been seized.

You are appealing against the Magistrates Court decision that you organised these events, provided sound
equipment or sourced premises.

You wish to introduce topics that have no bearing to the narrow issue which is did you organise or provide
equipment for these events, which if they went ahead would or had the potential of causing anti social
behaviour. I am under no obligation to argue points that are not relevant to your appeal.

I have copied Michael Carroll in in this email and you must now communicate with him as our relationship has
irretrievably broken down.

The case is listed again for disclosure if required on Wednesday before HHJ PAWLAK. A disclosure request
must be submitted by Michael Carroll & Co before 4pm on Monday 19th September 2016 with the Respondent
replying by 20th September 2016.

Andrew Locke is declining to represent you also as he cannot hold a meaningful conference with you. You
reject advice and have called me a liar.

about:blank 2/3
2505