Page 516 - 4. 2014 2nd half New 26-05-21 No Table

Police Officer: you believe that there is corruption in the police, you need to go to your
solicitor and log a complaint with your solicitor or professionally, log a complaint with the
police.
Simon: I have.
Police Officer: or you need to go to the Ipecac.
Simon; Sir, Sir.
Simon; OK! Carry on then sir.
Police Officer: if you have already done that if you already done that then you must let them
do their job, all right.
Simon; Sir can I just say something, OK I respect what you said to me, but I am asking for
the better judgement of yourself, which I understand that you are already trying to give to me,
but what my other issue is I have got lots of issues here that this case clearly said that it was
illegal the organisation of illegal raves yes therefore if it was illegal then I should have got
arrested under that pretence yes because there is; criminal and civil law because I never got
arrested for something that is illegal, now what I done was I logged three complaints in,
official complaints in through the police procedures and I done that under the Ipecac advice
to do that, now they told me, I got a letter here where the complaint got suspended until
further, until the case is over because it can cause produce towards the case, the on goings of
the case
Police Officer; “A mutter that not auditable.”
Simon; know what has been going on is these police understand, no matter what; the second
I get to court I will prove a section 63 should have never got imposed onto me, as for it is
only for outdoor events, and implying.
Police Officer: and when you got to go back to court.
Simon: they keep postponing the case until September.
Police Officer; “A mutter that not auditable.”
Simon: But the issue is I have been waiting since 2013 to prove, I am innocent, now what I
done to go even further
Police Officer: what you just when you first called was that you were organically, not first
found guilty.
Simon: Yes, that is what it was, and I have the transcripts right here to prove that.
Police Officer: what is wrong with you not being found guilty then?
Simon; year but when I got found not guilty what the judge did was wrong under the
applicant's case is, I got found not guilty but what they done, I got the transcripts’ saying that
he wasn’t found guilty for the organisation of illegal raves, what she done was she in the
court she goes well in 2014 you swore at a police officer, I got it in the transcripts, she goes,
so I will give you the Anti-Social Behaviour Order for that, but that is a section four or five
under the riot act and I should have got arrested then for that or I should have had a member
of the public bring a civil case and no one done that.
Police Officer: and who gave you that a judge?
Simon: yes, and she has done that incorrect and I am waiting.
Police Officer: she, she, have you complained against the judge?
Simon; Yes, yes I wrote two articles six’s and handed them in and I proved that all the 999
calls go backwards in time, yes, yes, from the previous one’s yes, it happens in about,
because I got, they accused me of ninety-three incident numbers yes, but they only gave me
the paperwork to thirty of them yes, for one day, now in them thirty days they have blocked
out grid hum location numbers yes and forgot to block out all the grid numbers, now when I
check the grid numbers, now I am being accused of one place being in Progress Way but the
grid numbers show that they are all across the country, Yes I could not be in one hundred
places at the same time.