Page 517 - 5. 2015 New 26-05-21 No Table

correct what the police was doing. The vehicle was seized, and my son
taken to the police station. Where he was later released with no charge,
but they made him sign the ticket and accept it.
I made calls to the police again and put complaints in about what had
gone on. but the police had gone of duty and would not be back on for 5
days. all I was told is we can take it to court and prove it. my son’s
insurance company was also making his insurance void. So, there were
many calls made to the police on 101. it was due to this a very nice lady
told me that to tell my son to go to the compound as they would have to
make a list of what was in any vehicles seized due to them becoming
liable. I sent emails to the compound as we only had the week end my
son’s insurance was due to be stopped at 12.00 on the 25/11/2013 and I
was also forwarding them over to
Signed
Witnessed By

28,
his insurance company so they got them as soon as they opened on the
Monday. I called the insurance company as soon as they opened on the
Monday also and they said they would try and contact the compound that
they would not stop his insurance until they heard something. Later that
afternoon i got an email asking if Simon could go to the compound and
call Kelly Tiller at KGM and the phone number was given in the email.
But due to the time if he had left then by the time he got to the compound
his insurance company would have been closed so I wrote an email saying
this and saying he would attend the police compound in the morning on
the 26/11/2013 which he did and spoke to a manager who confirmed to
Kelly Tiller on the phone there was no tools listed on the seizer notice and
nothing taken out of the vehicle. if tools were in the vehicle when it came
to the compound they would have been placed in safe storage and
returned when the vehicle was picked up.
Each time the vehicles have been seized he had to pay to get them out of
the compound.
The summons for this did come and I sent it off with a not guilty plea via
email, but it was what the police officer had written in his statement that
shocked me, there was nothing about any tools.
I was still trying to get all the information for the insurance company for
court I put in a number of subject access requests which they did not deal
with.
On the 26/11/2014 my son was found guilty at Wimbledon court. For no
insurance due to using the vehicle as business use. My son’s insurance is
trade insurance but not for odd jobs which the police officer had said. My
son was banned for driving got a fine and points from the court. On that
day my son’s heath was not good and the fact he was doing this case
himself did worry me he was not up to it. on this day we put an appeal in
which the court accepted.
This appeal was heard at Kingston upon Thames Crown Court on the
05/03/2015 but this time I had got the information form my son’s
insurance and had the audio’s of the 14/11/2013 between the police
officer and KGM and what he said to them, and the audio from the police