Page 375 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

At the hearing, nine perpetrators were charged on criminal offences ranging from disorderly
behaviour to attempted arson. Three of the gang were given ASBOs and six of the gang
signed acceptable behaviour agreements.
Conditions attached to the ASBOs were designed to protect the community from any
recurrence of the behaviour. The perpetrators were restricted to sleeping at their nominated
address and were not allowed out between 6.00pm and 6.00am unless accompanied by a
parent or appropriate adult. They were clearly instructed not to approach or interfere with any
prosecution witnesses. They were also prohibited from being verbally abusive and from
throwing missiles at any residential property or from
carrying anything which they could use to launch a missile.
The CPS advised the local media of the antisocial behaviour response court and the press
reported this operation on the front pages of the local papers. This is part of a strategy to
publicise successful action of the police, CPS and judiciary working in partnership to tackle
anti-social behaviour. Its aim is to encourage the community to report anti-social behaviour,
knowing that it will be dealt with effectively.
Outcome
The operation provided much needed relief for the residents in the area. A parent of one of
the gang members has since become proactive in a local community action group which is
working to increase diversionary activities for young people in the area.
For the professionals involved in the case, the operation has underlined the importance of
taking impact statements as a matter of course when victims fail to press charges due to fear
of reprisals. The multiagency partnership approach works best if one officer who is aware of
all the facts of the case co-ordinates the case.
Orders made in county court proceedings (section IB of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998)
For an application to be made in the county court, both the applicant and the person against
whom the application is made must be parties to the ‘principal proceedings’
(such as an eviction). Where the relevant authority is not a party to the principal proceedings,
an application to be had a party and the application for an order should be made as soon as
possible after the authority becomes aware of the principal proceedings. Where the person
alleged to have committed the anti-social behaviour is not a party but the relevant authority
thinks that his anti-social acts are material to the principal proceedings, the authority can
apply to have him joined in the proceedings and apply for an order. The county court will be
able to grant orders where the principal proceedings involve evidence of anti-social
behaviour.
Enabling the county courts to make orders may remove the need for a separate legal process
in the magistrates’ court and make it possible for the public to be protected from anti-social
behaviour more quickly and more efficiently.
An order made in county court proceedings might, for example, be useful to prevent an
individual, evicted from his accommodation for harassing his neighbours and/or others in the
area, from returning to the same area to continue the abusive behaviour.
375
140,
Simon Cordell’s Skeleton Argument (2) Pdf
- Taking a strategic approach
Orders can only work properly when they are based on partnership in action. They are
powerful instruments, and they will be at their most effective when all the agencies
confronted by an individual’s anti-social behaviour collaborate to make the best possible use
of them.
Orders made on conviction in criminal proceedings