Page 412 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 412

This information should, where possible, be collected on the basis of self-definition by the
               defendant.
               From December 2006, the new general duty under the Disability Discrimination Act requires
               a public authority to pay due regard when carrying out its functions to: the need to eliminate
               unlawful discrimination against disabled people; the need to eliminate disability-related
               harassment of disabled people; the need to promote equality of opportunity for disabled
               people; anti the need to take account of disabled persons’ disabilities even where that
               involves more favourable treatment. Advice on the general duty can also be obtained from
               the leaflet issued by the Office for Disability Issues (ODI) entitled Disability equality: a
               priority for all. The Disability Rights Commission website at www.dre.org.uk contains
               information under the section on publications entitled. Do the Duty’.
               Consistency of information will help to assess the effectiveness of orders and inform future
               local audits and crime reduction strategies.
               Local authorities and other agencies, including the police, have a duty under the Race
               Relations (Amendment) Act 2000 to
               178,
               Simon Cordell’s Skeleton Argument (2) Pdf
               •  Promoting awareness of orders
               The purpose of the orders is to protect local communities from the harassment, alarm or
               distress that can be caused by anti-social behaviour. An effective media strategy by the
               CDRP is therefore essential if local residents and businesses are to be aware of orders and
               their implications. Using the local press to ensure the community knows the subject and
               conditions of the order is often a cost-effective strategy. At the same time, the staff of the
               partner agencies need to understand how and when orders can be used, and how they relate to
               the other tools to combat anti-social behaviour available to the partnership.
               Local agencies and CDRPs should, within the context of their overall strategies for
               combating anti-social behaviour, devise a strategy for promoting awareness of orders. A
               designated officer should have responsibility for its delivery. This might most naturally be the
               CDRP anti-social behaviour co-ordinator. Disclosure of information should be necessary and
               proportionate to the objective it seeks to achieve.
               Suggested aims of the strategy
               The aims of an effective local publicity strategy are to:
               -       increase community confidence in reporting anti-social behaviour and expectations
               that it can be reduced.
               -       deter potential offenders from anti-social behaviour.
               -       ensure that the local population is aware of orders; the powers of the local authority,
               registered social landlords, Housing Action Trusts, the Environment Agency and the police
               (including the British Transport Police) to apply for them; and whom to approach if they
               believe that an order may be appropriate;
               -       ensure that agency staff have confidence in using orders where they are deemed
               appropriate; and
               -       ensure that potential witnesses are aware of the support available to them.
               -       Publicity
               -       Phis part of the guidance reflects the judgment of Lord justice Kennedy, presiding
               judge in the case of R (on application of Stanley, Marshall and Kelly) v Commissioner of
               Police for the Metropolis and Chief Executive of London Borough of Brent 12004] EWHC
               2229 (Admin), commonly referred to as Stanley v Brent.
               Principles
               1. There is no ‘naming and shaming1 - ASBOs are not intended to punish or embarrass
               individuals but to protect communities.
   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417