Page 456 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

to Benedicta Objidja inclusive of what she had just been explained, was that any letter would
need to be done by this court, which he agreed, he took some details and checked there
emails and said they had Mr Simon Cordell’s & miss Cordell’s Simon’s mother emails on
their system. He then took a copy of the paper work she had and said he would talk to
Benedicta Objidja, but was also confused at how many records was in error, he said to her
that if they are not in the court records then the cases was never in court and asked who she
had spoken to, who was working in the police station. He could not understand why this had
not been corrected; Errors like this should never happen on my sons PNC record. He also
stated he would put his notes into a legal advisor to get a letter written.
• In Reference to Pages (2 / 3) of the Applicants Bundle
- = Mr Simon Cordell did not attend any premises on this date to rave, neither was he
involved in the organization of a rave, nor did he supply any equipment for any rave at
Canary Wharf.
456
208,
Edited part 5.pdf
12/01/2013 = this case was only added as a reference as to the limitation Act 1980. Which
states a case must be applied 6 months prior from the date of the incident in question, to
which it was not. Please read Mr Simon Cordell’s last statement dated the 24/02.2015. He
was in fact taken to The Royal London Hospital, after being attacked on this day. (EXHIBIT)
No members of the public mention Mr Simon Cordell as a person acting in an anti-social
manner on this date, as well as police officer statement’s inclusive within the Applicants
bundle.
Due to Mr Simon Cordell establishing his company he states he was meeting a lot of people
in times of need, a lot of the people he was meeting are and was homeless, as he was looking
at avenues to be able to help people.
There are no CAD's otherwise known as incident numbers in regard to this date contained
within the applicants ASBO application.
• In Reference to Pages 2 / 3 contained within the applicant’s bundle.
07/04/2013 = In Steve Elsmore Statement dated 11/08/2014
07/04/2013 = Please read Mr Simon Cordell’s last statement dated the 24/02.2015. He States
He did not attended any premises on this date to rave, neither was he involved in the
organization of any illegal rave, nor did he supplied equipment on said date.
Mr Simon Cordell will State that he was not rude to police, but he did feel like he could not
even go out for the day with some of his friends, without getting stopped and searched by
members of the police.
It is also noted that the caller was very clear that they saw a flat screen TV being put into Mr
Cordell’s van, which is confusing to why when the police searched the van they found no TV,
but did in fact find two of his off road motor bikes, which is not included in Steve Elsmore
statement. The police did checks on Mr Simon Cordell’s Off Road Motor Bikes but this is
also not stated, but should show up on the seizer notice, as Mr Simon Cordell did asked the
police office to take careful note of the two of road motor bikes, as due to the high value of
them.
Mr Cordell Will state that he did get a bit upset when the police said they were going to seize
his van, as he did have insurance in place to be able to drive the van in question, but there
was an error on the MID database. Miss Cordell had been trying to help her son resolve the
issue concerning his insurance policy not showing on the mid data base alongside with
members of their local police force and his insurance company KGM too, together they had
tried to work out why Mr Simon Cordell was showing as uninsured. There was information
noted as intelligence on the police National Computer stating this I had asked the police to