Page 498 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

244,
Edited part 5.pdf
I did not go inside; the gates were closed.
I did not see any vehicles.
D’S Van reg is known to the police but I would not personally know.
There were vehicles parked but I did not notice whether defendants van was there.
He was not aware of people squatting in that building at that time.
(Hearsay of officers continues D @ venue but (unreadable text) Officer (unreadable
text) Not present here today.)
There was a rave on an adjourning RD but not on that day. (Please Take Note Here of
inspector Hamill stating under oath that he was sure all locations were to do with
progress way on this date.)
Phone calls received were not relating to Crown Rd Rave on that day.
On the day in question phone calls related to this particular rave. (Progress Way)
Witness - Pc Elsmore - R.O - 14;10 EIC Tab 6 - pg. ?14?
DEF XEX
Council (unreadable text) curfews (unreadable text) that PNC info on statement adds no
(unreadable text) plobatory (unreadable text) value of info re: Witness being “afraid of D”
What he puts down to the way he worded, but he meant that people actually are afraid of
possibly giving evidence in court.
R V CORDELL
4
DEF
Counsel argues that officer’s statement is designed to cause on evidence reaction of this of no
value and speculatory in nature.
DJ
How many calls from public did police receive?
Witness
In excess of 15 calls - how many to the same venue and not other address.
Doe’s does not know the number of callers that are in relation to each of these occasions.
On page 15 - Allegations re: Millmarsh Lane, evidence from officer not first-hand - relied on
cads and another Intel.
Query Re: “3 massive nitrous tanks”
DJ
Were did you get such info officer.
Witness
From Page 65 - sergeant King - Crimit’s Re reports, other Intel but not from people at the
venue.
COUNSEL
Officer you signed a statement of truth (unreadable text) to other witness statements.
DJ
We all know that on ASBO apps hearsay is allowed.
R V CORDELL
5
Counsel
Why did officer no and rely on Pc Kings Statements later than on the Crimit’s reported.
Officer no and involved in taking info from Pc King.
(Confesses he did it.)
He did not notice the discrepancy regarding official statements.