Page 520 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

Mr Simon Cordell will state that he at no point has he committed or been rightfully arrested
and charged for an offence to one of a similar nature presented within this ASBO application.
A/Insp Hamill 201566 On Friday 6th June 2014 when on duty in full uniform working as the
Duty Officer for the Borough of Enfield. Was working between the hours of 2200hrs to
0700hrs.
A/Insp Hamill 201566 "During the early hours of the 7th June I was made aware of a
potential Rave that was in progress in a discussed Industrial Building on Progress Way."
A/Insp Hamill 201566 "I have had a CAD created reference 1047I 7June dispatched officers
to the location to access numbers, crowd dynamics and gather information around times the
event is likely to
run until and also to make contact or identify the potential organiser. Officers have reported
back that Tyrone Benjamin and Simon Cordell where at location and to be the believed the
event organisers, there were approximately 200 people in attendance, the event was covered
by security officers who had stated that they were volunteers and not licensed through SIA.
Officers have spoken with staff to confirm that all fire escapes where clear, that there were
sufficient fire extinguishers in place and that there were first aid kits available."
" Mr Simon Cordell will state that this incorrect and not to be true as his brother had medical
injuries stopping him from being mobile or transported. Evidence will be supplied.
Mr Simon Cordell will state that he was not in attendance to attained any rave in fact he was
dropping keys to a friend as they had been left at his address when he was there last."
A/Insp Hamill 201566 "Police Officers have reported back: The police sent by inspector
Hamill reported back to him and said they had spoken to Security officers at the gate of
progress way, who stated that they were volunteers not security as believed by police offices.
"Who made this statement?"
If they were believed by police officers to be security, but had said they were volunteers,
what makes the police sure beyond reasonable doubt that the people in question presented to
be security acting as volunteers could have in fact off been the organisers. As Mr Simon
Cordell will state that he was not the organiser neither did he hire any sound equipment, nor
did he take part in any form of organization on the 6th 7th 8th June 2014 or act in an Anti-
Social Manner. In the new skeleton argument the inspector
520
264,
Edited part 5.pdf
clearly states that he now trusts the security guards when officers state that they believed they
were security but said they were volunteers and looked like party goers.
A/Insp Hamill 201566 "Police Officers have reported back: Staff was forthcoming with
information but refused to allow offices inside the venue."
"As stated they never believed the information provide by said staff at the gates of progress
way to be true, as it was believed the security was to be presenting them self's as volunteers,
so why would any information provided to officers can be classed and stated as forthcoming
be classed as to be true, if not believed to be true by the person writing the statement in the
beginning, as said by police officers, the people at the gate also refused to allow police
officers inside the venue."
A/Insp Hamill 201566 "Due to call demand during the shift and low policing numbers it was
inappropriate to enter the premises to seize the equipment and close the event, but he
deployed officers to conduct regular visits to the venue, where number at their peak where
500 but reported to be quiet and peaceful."
" Mr Simon Cordell will state that he was not involved in any event or Anti-Social Behaviour
on the 6th 7th 8th June2014, he only went to drop some keys off to a friend that he had a call