Page 546 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

Josey the case for illegal raves has not been proven at the trial already and can never be
proven as there is no trespass to the applications case. The team raves cannot be used in a
legal team read Simon 90-page document and you will see the law there in it.
Why do you think in the new Skeleton Argument the word illegal has been taken out within
the whole document and the word rave has only been used? But they cannot use this team in
the application as said above the team raves cannot be used in a legal team.
So now what is the case Simon acted in an anti-social manner, well clearly this is the case
that was proven at trial but I cannot understand why and no one else can even the councils I
have spoken to do not know how this was proven, as not one police officer stood up at trial
and said Simon acted in a rude or anti-social manner towards them, they said he spoke to
them and done what they asked of him. The witness statements not one of them can give an
ID of Simon so how do they know it was Simon that has acted in an anti-social manner?
Josey to prove this case the burden has to be of high standard, and it is not, or they would
have been able to prove illegality at trial which could not be proven.
Josey there was a reason the application was done in the way it was they could not prove
outright Simon acted in a way to prove he:
• That the offender has acted, at any time since XXXXXX in an anti-social manner, that is
to say in a manner that caused or was likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress to one
or more persons not of the same household as himself, and
• An order under this section is necessary to protect persons in any place in England and
Wales from further anti-social acts by him.
The reason being Simon did not act in an anti-social manner to any person and this is proven
in their own application. AS said above Simon was not rude to anyone even the police he
spoke to them so this is not acting, in an anti-social manner that is to say in a manner that
caused or was likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress to one or more persons not of the
same household as himself.
But if he was the organisers of these illegal raves then he would be the person that was
overall reasonable for any person that caused or was likely to cause harassment, alarm or
distress.
They cannot prove Simon was the organisers of these illegal raves.
Once you have had time to look after Simon document tonight can you please supply bullets
of all points you feel he has issues.
Would it also please be possible to ask the court for more time in order to get the document in
as Simon does not want to run out of time in order to get this all addressed and all documents
in and the list of witness that will need to be called that was due in yesterday to the court.
394,
Regards
Lorraine
From: JOSEPHINE WARD
mailto: josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com
Sent: 09 February 2016 15:59
To: Lorraine Cordell
Subject: Re: Simon's updated statement
Lorraine
I am sorry that you have not been well.
As the updated statement is not yet completed by Simon please indicate when this statement
will be ready. This is not a rushed request as you seem to suggest, you were aware of this
from before Christmas break so please do not blame me.
The information that you are asking me to request from does not assist Simon's case and if
anything will lead to an inference that he is involved with the organisers of the rave. If Simon