Page 565 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

09-08-14-03.png
Simon please look at this email and attachments and see if it ok to send Josey please as I am
not sending it without your say so.
Hi Josey
I know it is the weekend and I am not asking you to reply to this over the weekend but if you
could please do this on Monday, I would be grateful.
I am very worried and know that things will not be ready for the 22/02/2016 when this 3-day
trial is due to start.
You don't have a barrister yet and from what you have said all the barristers you asked have
said no they will not deal with this case as it is to large, and I am very worried as any barrister
will not time to go over all the paper work if they agreed to take this on.
I don't know what will happen in a case if you can't get a barrister as this has never happened.
And I don't want a barrister turning up that don't know anything about this case nor does
Simon.
I am not sure what is going on with the public order unit information I know you said you can
deal with this when you got the refusal from the section 35 DPA and FOI Act you put in from
Val Tanner. Also I have large issues with how she did the refusal due to the rules that are set
when a DPA request or a FOI request is put in. it has to be sent to the data protection officer
to deal with it, Val Tanner should not have just been able to refuse this. But as far as I am
aware nothing has been done can you please explain what your plans are for this matter
please.
There has been no list given to the court for witnesses that will need to be called and this is
worrying me a great deal as they can just say sorry your witness list was not in time it should
have been in for the 8th Feb 2016.
We were meant to be asking for all the missing CAD's and for them to un blacked the CAD's
grid ref out for all grid ref this would be
• ATT - Map grid Ref:
• INC - Map Grid Ref:
• CALL LOC - Map Grid Ref:
The reason for this is please see attached PDF and you will see why.
Also I cannot see why nearly full pages are blacken out, I cannot understand a need for this as
far as I am aware the only thing that should be needed to be blacked out is the information as
to the caller. Why would there be a need to blacken out full pages.
Also on page 39 statement of PC Jason Ames there is a next CAD that is missing CAD 9717
09/08/2014 that related to the intelligence received to the illegal rave on Millmarsh Lane the
information in that CAD must have given the information to the address as PC Jason Ames
and Aaron King went right to the address, this is Every Decibel Matters. Please also see
Aaron King statement page 41. I believe the information came from the public order unit for
Every Decibel Matters. Due to this post which I have attached to this email.
I know you had all the information that was meant to be asked for re the CAD's. And I not
sure if anything has been done about this. Or what the plan of action will be for this is.
I know you have sent the email now to Superintendent Coombs for him to do a statement, we
don't know if this will come back in time, I know when I spoke to him he said he was willing
to do a statement but that was a long time ago.
This case has made Simon so ill they have the information on the police Systems Josey they
know this was not Simon already. Are they allowed to withhold information they have got
that they know will prove someone has not done what they say to get a case proved or guilty?
Josey this needs to go back to court ASAP as I do not want the judge blaming Simon that
things have not be done and it is not ready. the judge needs to understand the information we
are after and why.