Page 825 - 7. 2016 Last three months the 10 - 11 - 12 No Table

information that has been passed to people, but it was not installed for that reason but has
helped in this the main reason it was installed was due to security.
But since the 14/08/2016 when the police themselves damaged the CCTV camera due to what
they were doing to Mr Simon Cordell, it has not worked. So, at this time there is no CCTV in
operation in the communal area of the block the only CCTV that is operational at this time is
the ones inside Mr Simon Cordell flat itself. When Mr Simon Cordell was on a phone call to
Sarah Fletcher on the 22/11/2016 she did say if the CCTV camera was facing Mr Simon
Cordell’s front door there would be no problem with that this is at this time being acted on.
It also seems that this complaint has come in very late as if any neighbours felt that this was
an invasion of their privacy why was this not acted on in 2013 when it was installed? Why
has it taken them until 2016 to say they feel this is an invasion of their privacy?
In fact I feel it has protected Mr Simon Cordell’s neighbours there has been crime in the area
and many break ins within the housing estate where everyone lives, yet not one person has
been effected in the block Mr Simon Cordell lives in by crime and I believe this is due to the
CCTV being there, and if anything happened to any of the neighbours in the block the police
could obtain a copy. The CCTV camera does not show any neighbours living in the block,
front doors or windows. And only showed part of the ground floor communal area leading up
to Mr Simon Cordell’s own front door. It also makes us feel the only reason that the
neighbours have now said about the CCTV is due to what they are trying to say about Mr
Simon Cordell in these complaints, I feel that at this time the CCTV is the thing that
protected Mr Simon Cordell against what the neighbours have alleged, why else would it
have taken them over 3 years to say they now felt it was an invasion of their privacy?
As said in my formal complaint the police don’t like Mr Simon Cordell and this has been for
many years when the police go to Mr Simon Cordell flat, he feels safer that the CCTV is
there as it shows what the police are doing to Mr Simon Cordell so makes him feel safer, has
the police put a report in about the CCTV camera also?
As stated these allegations are very serious and I would like them addressed as soon as
possible but until I have the information I have asked for so know what dates and times these
complaints were put in I feel that Enfield council is only taking one side to this and that is the
neighbours, as since 2014 all my calls and emails and letter about my complaints re the
neighbours Enfield Council has done nothing to help me or Mr Simon Cordell address this.
Mr Simon Cordell feels he has no option left to him but to move away from his home due to
what has been ongoing for a long time with no one addressing it. He feels that is the only way
he will feel safe again from what the neighbours are doing to him, yet Enfield Council have
said they will do nothing about this to help him and while this is ongoing it is affecting his
heath more and more.
2600,
Mr Daniel Ellis has said that my formal complaint should be addressed by the 14/12/2016 but
is trying to compete this sooner, he has been told that no one within Enfield Council is
addressing moving Mr Simon Cordell to a new address and this needs acting on as soon as
possible as what is going on cannot be left with nothing being done as this is making Mr
Simon Cordell’s life hell living in fear, and so far I believe no one within Enfield Council is
addressing moving Mr Simon Cordell to a new place, this is unacceptable by any means for
Enfield Council not to be addressing this issue, I have made many calls and not one person
has called me back to gather information or give me an update if anything is being done
about addressing a move for Mr Cordell, so from what I can see once again Enfield Council
is not acting in an appropriate manner. I also believe when I get the information from the
subject access request which can take up to 40 days this will incur more issues and I believe
there will be data that needs to be corrected which Enfield Council holds on Mr Simon
Cordell, as under the data protection act data which is held has to be 100% accurate, I also