Page 404 - Pages from 8. 2017 New 26-05-21 No Table- 3rd Half

BETWEEN:

{CLAIMANT}

THE MAYOR AND BURGESSES OF THE
LONDON BOROUGH OF ENFIELD

-AND-

(DEFENDANT)

MR SIMON CORDELL

DIRECTIONS ORDER

could have well been arrested in light of Mr
Mathiyalagan being able to evidence the incident
by way of the audio recordings.
151. The recent incidents and death threats are
extremely serious and i have concerns that the
Defendant may escalate his actions further. Mr
Mathiyalagan and his family do not feel safe
anymore and on that basis, it would be of great
assistance if the Claim and injunction order be
reinstated as soon as possible.
Declaration from the Court that the injunction
order has been effective throughout the period
of 13th December 2017 to present
152. The interim injunction order was
discharged purely because of a technicality,
however had the Court realised that the Claimant
had filed the questionnaire on time, it would not
have struck out the Claim.
153. The Court should note that the Defendant
started to act anti-socially again, soon after he was
notified by the Court that the interim order has
been discharged. Unfortunately, because the
Claim was struck out the Claimant and the police
are currently not able to take any actions against
the Defendant. It is on that basis that we would
like to ask the Court for a declaration that that the
interim injunction order has been effective since
13th December 2017 and that the Defendant has
been in breach of the interim injunction order
dated 09th August 2017.
154. However, in the event that the Court
cannot make such a declaration, we would ask the
Court to make a new injunction order to cover the
recent incidents dated 02nd and 3rd January