Page 11 - tmp

Defendant was due to allegations of verbal abuse, threats, harassment and
intimidation made against him by some of his neighbours.

2. I make this Witness Statement in support of the Claimant’s application dated

th
08 January 2018. This is my second witness statement in the above
proceedings.

Backgrounds to the case

3. The Claimant obtained an interim injunction against the Defendant on 09 th
th
August 2017 under claim number D02ED073. On 13 December 2017, the
Court made an order striking out the Claimant’s claim on the basis that it failed

th
to file its direction questionnaire on 17 November 2017 as directed. The Court
th
stated that it received the Claimant's questionnaire on 20 November 2017 and
therefore ordered that the Claim be struck out and that the interim injunction
order be discharged.

4. The Claimant's solicitor emailed the Edmonton County Court on 14 November
th
2017 asking that the Claim be reinstated as it had filed its direction

th
questionnaire on 17 November at 11.59 and was therefore within time. The
email has not been responded to until today.

rd
5. On 03 January 2018, the Claimant filed an application notice at the Court by
email asking for the Claim to be reinstated. The application was filed after the
nd
Court served an order dated 02 January 2018 ordering the Claimant to pay
the Defendant’s legal costs. A copy of the application notice can be found

under exhibit LN01.

6. Mr Mathiyalagan who is one of the Defendant’s neighbours and resident at Flat
117 Burncroft Avenue, Enfield contacted me and complained about further

incidents of anti-social behaviour he was subjected to by the

10