Page 196 - tmp

7/29/2017 Print

Subject: Fwd: Simon's case
From: JOSEPHINE WARD (josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com)

To: re_wired@ymail.com;
Date: Sunday, 11 August 2013, 16:47

FYI

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk>
Date: Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:05 AM
Subject: RE: Simon's case
To: JOSEPHINE WARD <josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com>

Hi Jose

Simon does not blame you at all he knows you got a lot to do, and knows you do your job he just felt while you was away
the office did not have a cue on what to do. He just wanted a reply as to what was going on and that was not happening.
And did not in fact know that Michael Company was not involved in his case he was thinking that Michael
Company was acting for him so when you went away they could deal with it which they did not. Michael also
has talked to Simon about this on the phone more then once so is aware of this Simon did not like the way in
which Michael talked to me or him but the last time he talked to Michael that was sorted over the phone.

Josey we don’t have a problem with you at all. The problem we had was no one was able to deal with anything
while you were away and that should not be the case the office should be able to deal with things if you are not
around.

Lorraine

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [mailto:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]
Sent: 07 August 2013 22:10
To: Lorraine Cordell
Subject: Simon's case

Hi Lorraine

Winchester Crown Court

about:blank 1/3
174