Page 644 - tmp
P. 644

From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
             Sent: 06 March 2014 13:00
             To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD'
             Subject: RE: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention re disclosure issues 6th March 2014 Hi Josey

             Simon is not going to attend court today which I do think is best as he is very unstable at this time.
             Have you had a chance to go over the discloser yet and with this can an application be put in for Simon bail conditions to be looked at as
             soon as possible due to how unwell he is at this time?
             Lorraine





             From: JOSEPHINE WARD [mailto:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]
             Sent: 05 March 2014 20:46
             To: Lorraine Cordell
             Subject: Re: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention re disclosure issues 6th March 2014
             Hi Lorraine

             Jemi will be attending himself. The case is listed at 2pm in court 12 I think. Simon is more than welcome to attend.

             Regards

             Josephine



             On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
             Hi Josey
             Simon knows about court tomorrow and he wants to attend. Can you let me know the time for court tomorrow and who will be attending
             will it be Jemi?

             I am shocked at what the CPS has sent over. They have known all along people was arrested at the party in Feb 2013 with items from the
             building, saw the damage to the warehouse
             and still NFA these people they even had the police watching the building seeing people take lots of things out the building in Feb 2013.
             So really had them red-handed and still done nothing. And NFA the people they did arrest.

             Josey, they know Simon did not do this so why charge him and put this all on him, this is why they are covering up and don’t want to give
             the information.

             Again, they have withheld so much information like the pictures from Feb 2013.
             Again, they have not given any of the officer names that were there before the party started in May 2013 and let the party carry on
             knowing all this information.
             This is clearly a setup.

             Can Simon bail be address with this information?

             Lorraine

















                                                     622
   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649