Page 652 - tmp
P. 652

2013 with items from the building, saw the damage to the warehouse
           and still NFA these people they even had the police watching the building seeing people take lots of things out
           the building in Feb 2013. So really had them red­handed and still done nothing. And NFA the people they did
           arrest.

           Josey they know Simon did not do this so why charge him and put this all on him, this is why they are covering
           up and don’t want to give the information.

           Again they have withheld so much information like the pictures from Feb 2013.

           Again they have not given any of the officer names that were there before the party started in May 2013 and let
           the party carry on knowing all this information.

           This is clearly a setup.

           Can Simon bail be address with this information?

           Lorraine







           From: JOSEPHINE WARD [mailto:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]
           Sent: 05 March 2014 17:09
           To: Lorraine Cordell; too smooth
           Subject: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention re disclosure issues 6th March 2014

           Dear Simon / Lorraine


           The case is listed tomorrow for mention re disclosure.  Simon you are not required to attend but are
           free to  attend.

           I attach the CRIS, received this morning re the February 2014 matter.


           I will go over this at some point this evening once I finish at the police station.


           Regards

           Josephine





















                                                     630
   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657