Page 825 - tmp
P. 825

From: JOSEPHINE WARD [josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]
            Sent: 07 April 2014 14:29
            To: Lorraine Cordell
            Subject: Re: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court 8th April 2014
            Lorraine


            The previous conviction discrepancies will be highlighted counsel to counsel between the prosecution
            and the defence. Tactically we have to withhold certain information in particular the email from the
            council.  I have referred to the noise abatement officer attending and alluded to police also being in
            attendance.

            The CPS is the organisation that makes the decision on continuing the prosecution and it the police
            are failing to investigate and we provide written representations with evidence in support then the
            prosecution may review on the grounds that there is no realistic prospect of conviction.  This is the
            most sensible approach.

            As advised earlier once my headache clears I will be drafting detailed representations with a view to
            the CPS reviewing the prosecution in this case.

            Regards

            Josephine



            On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Lorraine Cordell <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

              Hi Josey



              Sorry to hear you are ill I hope you feel better soon.



              I notice that nothing is in there for the bail application for the PNC and the failing to surrender that should not
              be on his record. Which he does have bail condition set for failing to surrender. And can the issues about his
              PNC be given in court tomorrow without it being in the bail application as I do feel the judge should be told
              about these errors on Simon record as there is also more then one error and these did have a deciding factor
              towards his bail condition in this case.



              And are we showing the court the email from the council which does show the police was aware of the party
              before 04/05/2013 and that it was being squatted before Simon had even attended the building?



              I was thinking that all this information would have been needed to show the judge how bad this case really is.



              Will it be Jemi that will attend court tomorrow?





              From: JOSEPHINE WARD [mailto:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]

                                                                 803
   820   821   822   823   824   825   826   827   828   829   830