Page 524 - tmp
P. 524

From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
            Sent: 03 February 2015 12:57
            To: 'London.magistratessouth@cps.gsi.gov.uk'
            Cc: 'swglondonmc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk'
            Subject: Re: Simon Cordell

            Attachments: Appeal­Case­Driving­Tools­26­11­2014.pdf; S Cordell 020215.pdf; MT
            Underwriting_FW_ MR SIMON CORDELL ­ CX52 JRZ.pdf; s cordell call from police 141113.wma;
            26_11_2013_13_53__KellyTiller kelly call to compound.wav
            Dear Debbie Barnett

            Thank you for taking the time to talk to me today on the phone one the 02/02/2015. Could you please also
            confirm by email that you have this email.

            As explained, there have been a number of issues with my son Simon Cordell DOB: 26/01/1981.

            The issues are one of not being insured. When in fact he was.

            There was a case heard on the 26/11/2014 at Wimbledon Magistrates' Court where my son Simon Cordell was
            found guilty. Of using his vehicle for business purposes.

            This was only the case due to the police officer lying. Not just to KGM who my son was insured with, but in his
            statement of facts, and also on oath to the judge and CPS.

            The case is such that on the day my son was stopped the police office made a call to KGM the police office told
            KGM that my son Simon Cordell had lots of  tools in his van and was doing odd jobs. Under my son insurance
            this would not have covered him and the police officer would have known this already as my son had given the
            police officer his policy at the side of the road.

            My son was arrested and taken to the police station. Due to him refusing to sign the seizer notice and telling the
            police officer he was lying and to arrest him.

            My sons Van registration CX52JRZ was seized and taken to Chariton police vehicle pound, with no tools in
            there.

            The police office when wrote his statement not with what he told KGM on the phone call but with something
            totally incorrect information. The judge asked the police office at court about the tools as he saw emails from
            KGM the police office told the judge he new nothing about any tools.

            The police officer I believed new he could not put tools down in his statement as calls was already being put into
            the police about complaints. So changed his story in his statement.

            The facts are that there is audio tapes of what the police officer said to KGM, and also the call that was made to
            Chariton police vehicle pound as KGM record all calls.

            I have both of the audio files from KGM and also a Letter of Indemnity and an email that a manager sent to Kelly
            Tiller at KGM.

            How can a police officer act in such a manner. I really do not understand why he did this.

            As also said on the phone there is a number of summons my son has not had regarding the other stops from
            police, these case he have gone to court without him knowing and he been found guilty when he did not even
            know there was a case in court.

            I have sent many emails to get these cases set aside and sent his insurance documents to the court. 2 case we
            had to do statutory declarations one for Willesden and one for Bromley. The Willesden one seems to have been
            reheard at court on the 26/01/2015 without us knowing again he was found guilty but they put this case under a
            new case number looking at the letter so all the documents that were sent before was not with the court file I
            would have through. But with both statutory declarations we added a copy of his insurance.

            I have been trying for some time to get all of this put together so it can all be addresses and so far nothing has
            been done with all the emails I have sent to the court. We also asked at court when we went to Wimbledon
            Magistrates' Court but nothing was done. Could you please tell us where we can sort this out about getting all
                                                    1502
   519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526   527   528   529