Page 591 - tmp

The police office when wrote his statement not with what he told KGM on the phone call but with something
totally incorrect information. The judge asked the police office at court about the tools as he saw emails from
KGM the police office told the judge he new nothing about any tools.

The police officer I believed new he could not put tools down in his statement as calls was already being put into
the police about complaints. So changed his story in his statement.

The facts are that there is audio tapes of what the police officer said to KGM, and also the call that was made to
Chariton police vehicle pound as KGM record all calls.

I have both of the audio files from KGM and also a Letter of Indemnity and an email that a manager sent to Kelly
Tiller at KGM.

How can a police officer act in such a manner. I really do not understand why he did this.

As also said on the phone there is a number of summons my son has not had regarding the other stops from
police, these case he have gone to court without him knowing and he been found guilty when he did not even
know there was a case in court.

I have sent many emails to get these cases set aside and sent his insurance documents to the court. 2 case we
had to do statutory declarations one for Willesden and one for Bromley. The Willesden one seems to have been
reheard at court on the 26/01/2015 without us knowing again he was found guilty but they put this case under a
new case number looking at the letter so all the documents that were sent before was not with the court file I
would have through. But with both statutory declarations we added a copy of his insurance.

I have been trying for some time to get all of this put together so it can all be addresses and so far nothing has
been done with all the emails I have sent to the court. We also asked at court when we went to Wimbledon
Magistrates' Court but nothing was done. Could you please tell us where we can sort this out about getting all
the other cases addressed without the need to be going from one court to the next. This is a waste of courts time
and money when clearly all that is needed to be is check my son’s insurance that he was in fact insured.

I am sure that the letter that has been sent of Indemnity from KGM would cover these other cases as proof he
was in fact insured. Could you please advise what needs to be done with these other cases.

Please can you address the issues in this email and get back to me by email.

Regards

Lorraine Cordell

1569