Page 625 - tmp
P. 625

Date: 9 February 2015 11:29:00 GMT
            To: Josephine Ward <josie@michaelcarrollandco.com>
            Cc: Austin,
            Andrew <Andrew.Austin@canopius.com>,lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk>
            Subject: RE: Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul Cordell on 5th March 2015 at Kingston
            Upon Thames Crown Court

            Dear Ms Ward,

            I have drafted a section 9 statement as requested. Before I sign it off can you review it and confirm it satisfies
            all of your requirements please? As soon as you do so I will sign it off, scan a copy over to you and put the
            original in the post.

            Let me know if you need anything else and of course if you need me to amend the attached in any way.

            Lorraine/Andy – FYI.

            Regards

            Peter Wood
            UK Specialty Operations Manager |
            UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group
            KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ
            D +44 (0) 20 8530 9120 | www.kgminsurance.co.uk | www.canopius.com


            From: Josephine Ward [mailto:josie@michaelcarrollandco.com]
            Sent: 08 February 2015 19:02
            To: Wood, Peter; Austin, Andrew
            Cc: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
            Subject: Appeal against conviction for no insurance Regina v. Simon Paul Cordell on 5th March 2015 at Kingston
            Upon Thames Crown Court

            Dear Mr Wood

            I have been instructed by Mr Simon Paul Cordell and Miss Lorraine Cordell to assist in the appeal
            against conviction that is due to be heard at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court on 5th March 2015
            at 10am.

            Miss Cordell has played two recordings that she received from KGM which are pertinent to the appeal
            but at present as the telephone recordings have not been produced as an exhibit by KGM they will not
            be admissible at court.

            Can you therefore please write a section 9 statement confirming that:

            (a) all recording equipment was working correctly
            (b) KGM produced two recordings at the request of Ms Lorraine Cordell
            (c) Confirmation that the recording of S Cordell call from police 141113 Recording was provided by
            KGM from their recorded calls and is authentic
            (d) Confirmation that the recording between the Car Pound and Kelly Tiller was also provided from
            the KGM recorded calls and is authentic

            If we are in possession of a section 9 statement producing the recordings then we will not have to
            apply to the court for a Third Party Summons to compel an employee from KGM to attend to produce
            the recordings.  This would be a complete waste of your time when all we require is a section 9
            attesting to the recordings being retrieved from the system and exhibited as two separate recordings.

                                                                1603
   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630