Page 893 - tmp

information that was needed to prove in fact the police officer lied, the Judge was appalled and that is using mid
words as to what was said in court because once again the police officer lied under oath to the judge in fact the
police officer was told not to leave the court building. Simon won this case and there is a huge complaint with the
police at this time. Simon for the appeal had to pay for a barrister at the cost of £2475.00

Martin was also asked to do a witness statement for this case but failed to do so.

He still has 2 more appeals for no insurance one listed for May 2015 most of his 2014/2015 insurance he has not
been able to drive due to KGM and what they made happen to his driving licence. But I know cancelling an
insurance policy after it has started would incur large costs so we have just been paying for something he has
really not been able to use. So yes a claim for costs will be going into KGM which will be a large about of
money. For what has happened to my son as he not been able to work also due to his job which he does need to
drive to do this and has not been able to do so.

I also believe I am now going to have to put a subject access request under the data protection act 1994 into
Broadsure Direct to get all the data as Martin has stopped replying to my emails.

If you can confirm the above I would be grateful as I will need these for my record.

Regards

Lorraine Cordell

From: Melanie Tyman [mailto:melanietwyman@broadsuredirect.com]
Sent: 13 March 2015 11:49
To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
Subject: REF: 00­COSX14MT07­ID<86> OpenAttach Documents

Hi Lorraine

As requested below are the payments which have been made to date on the Motor Trade policy from the
renewal date of 19/08/2014:

The premium of £1452.51 was originally fully financed with Close Brothers premium Finance on an 11
monthly scheme with monthly collections of £149.21, below are the payments collected via Close:

st
st
1 instalment due 21/10 for £298.45 (double collection to bring account up to date as the 1 facility
cancelled due to default and a new facility was set hence the double collection) ‐rejected
Reapplied 31/10/2014 for £298.45 + £30.00 default fee – payment successful

nd
2 instalment due 19/11 for £149.21 – rejected
Card payment made on 08/12/2014 for £179.21 (instalment plus default fee)

rd
3 instalment due 19/12/2014 for £149.21 – rejected
Card payment made on 09/01/2015 for £179.21 (instalment plus default fee)

th
4 instalment due 19/01/2015 for £149.21 – rejected

th
As the 4 payment was never made the account cancelled on the 10/02/2015 with a balance owed of
£996.37

We then arranged a revised payment plan for the outstanding amount of £996.37 of 1 instalment of £180.00
& 4 instalments of £204.09, below are the payments which have currently been made on the revised payment
plan:

£180.00 paid 11/02/2015
1871