Page 934 - tmp
P. 934

From: Lorraine Cordell
          To: "Micheal McKee"; "JOSEPHINE WARD"
          Subject: FW: RE FOI 11845 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
          Date: 20 March 2015 15:33:00
          Attachments: Request for a review - FOI 11845 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED].pdf

          Dear Michael
          Please see attached document from Enfield Council
          So, Progress Way was used before as you can see from the email below it was 1st used on the 25/03/2013 so
          way before 06th 07th 08th June 2014 I also know they are withholding dates back and locations. So, asked for
          this to go for independent review which I was hoping the data would have been back by now but I only just got
          an email today please see attached. I asked for the independent review on the 10/03/2015 and from that date
          they have 20 working days to deal with it.

          I think also the council have got something to answer to here also. maybe they could not go without police to
          locations at Crown road when there was a party taking place, but they knew people was living in the said
          building as their homes. And therefore, could have arranged for someone to attend the building within the
          weekdays and they could have served a noise abetment order at any time within the time the parties were on
          going. They do not need a person name to serve a noise abatement order to an occupier. So, what the police are
          saying about they need a name is untrue and I know this is a fact.

          Also, the council only say in the last email about one date for a party at Crown road when clearly you can see
          from the list there was a lot more of them. Maybe the council were working with the new owner but why was
          a noise abatement order never served on the occupiers.

          I think maybe they need to be asked to attend court as clearly, they are not doing their job in the correct way.
          But we will see as information comes in maybe you could put a request for data to them as clearly a freedom of
          information is very limited.

          From: Ned Johnson [mailto:Ned.Johnson@enfield.gov.uk]
          Sent: 09 March 2015 12:21
          To: Lorraine Cordell Cc: Esg Complaints
          Subject: RE: RE FOI 11845 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
          Classification: UNCLASSIFIED

          Dear Ms. Cordell,
          In terms of the number of events there was one further rave that took place on 25th March 2013 at Progress
          Way, other than this occurrence I have provided you with the dates and locations of all the illegal raves/parties
          that are recorded on our database as well as all other data we hold that you requested. The rave on March 25th
          2013 was attended by the Out of Hours Noise Team, assistance was requested from the police but they were
          unable to help on that occasion.


          The events at Crown Road were over a period of several weeks not months, during which time we were in
          regular contact with the new site owners who worked to get the site secured and the power turned off. The Out
          of Hours Noise Team undertook observations of the noise during the event on May 31st/June 1st but did not
          visit the party as the team decided that it was unsafe















                                                    1912
   929   930   931   932   933   934   935   936   937   938   939