Page 508 - tmp

8/6/2017 Print
be reviving a letter to sign to be sent to Sally Gill Hurst.
On receiving this letter it raised the following concerns. 1. The paperwork has
not been served in time. 2. In a preliminary hearing, so to be
ready for the appeal the judge ordered this to be achieved. 3. The respondent
has had another 6 months sine 22/02/2016 from the start of the on goings as
dated 13/08/2014 4. We are now at 08/09/2016 the appeal is
on the 26/09/2016 this leads me to the concerns of once again the case being
postponed, as it has already been ten times before. 5. I have handed to article
Six the right to a speedy and fair trial in regard to some of my human rights
being breached because of the on goings in the ASBO proceedings drafting clear
corruption and fabricated evidence asking for the case to be investigated our
the correct paperwork to be
served in accordance to my response to HHJ PAWLAK.

6. Yes, my
instructions are clear, I did
not organised any illegal raves or provide any equipment with an intention of
holding an illegal rave and surely did not cause any Anti Social behavior on
the dates sighted, this is also to include Mill Marsh Lane with no exception.
7. Yes in some I am visiting my friends who are or were
homeless at the time. 8. The legal technicality you state that I refer to i.e.
absence of trespass that does not prevent parties from being held in accordance
of the law, may lead to a stand alone anti social behavior order if a person
commits a public order offence, to which I did not cause as I was not organizer
neither did I take part in the organisation of the party or did I commit any
civil or criminal offence. 9. In any one un-regular occasion over the
duration of the weekend I can a understand the noise nuisance and distress to
neighbors this can cause if the allegations were to be true and not fabricated
by police as I can prove. I was not the organizer of the event. The case is
based on what the respondent based it upon and in my case this is the
organisation of illegal raves not the organisation of raves:- 1. I proved that
indoor parties are not illegal unless there is a breach of the licensing act
2003 as this is the law for entertainment. 2. That the word rave can not be
used in a building as section 63 requires as a key element unless tress pass
has taken place. 3. I proved that I was not the organizer of the
events as I was not. 4. That I never took part in any anti social behavior or
intended or encouraged any other person to neither. 5. Anti social behavior was
not clearly caused as a result of the Progress
Way by myself or my actions as I was
only a visitor who never caused any offence. I feel as my
solicitor you should have my best interest at heart and if you Know a police
officer to be caught for being corrupt for, the
evidence that they have supported so that your client faced a wrongful conviction of any
sort you should not encourage them to not stand up for what is correct and
right, so I do not understand why you would ask me to reconsider whether the
attached document should be served on the Respondent. The amendments I made
have all ready been served on the 22/02/2016 and the Judge ask for the
respondent to answer them questions from the 01/02/2016 and the
respondent refuse to do so. I do insist for the challenges to be answered as it
is my life that has been tarnished for civil proceedings so I do confirm this on
writing. I feel that the meeting has been left by yourself to the
last minute I have been requesting this in a multitude of emails to be achieved
well in advance to the date that you have now sited a few days before the
appeal, when I know that you have had
ample amounts of time, so if this is the earliest time I will take it and I
look forward to meeting Mr Andy Locke, thank you. I do not see how the case
will not get re listed due to lack of disclosure to be quite frank. I do not

about:blank 2/4
2486