Page 215 - tmp

lied to his insurance company about tools being in the vane, all it would have took was for the inspector to check
the van at that time, he would have then seen something was really wrong as there was no tools and would have
seen this, and this could have been addressed there and then without the need for my son to have been arrested.

If there is anything you need for me please let me know.

Regards

Lorraine Cordell

From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto:Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk]
Sent: 30 January 2017 12:56
To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
Subject: RE: PC/6804/13

Hello Ms Cordell,

I hope this email finds you well.

Have you had a chance to look at the document attached to my last email?

Kind regards

Jamie Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards |

MetPhone 786675 | Telephone 0207 161 6675 | Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk
Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR

From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 23 January 2017 13:58
To: Newman Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk>
Subject: RE: PC/6804/13

Dear Jamie Newman

Yes I am dealing with on behalf of my son have been from the start. So if everything can be done via this email I
would be grateful.

I will look at the attached document today, but do believe you have had contact with Martin Jerkins and he
confirms that the Police officer
did not say about any tools or Mr Cordell going round doing odd jobs on that call. As the police officer did when
he made the call to KGM.

Regards

Lorraine Cordell

From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto:Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk]
Sent: 23 January 2017 10:24
To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
Subject: RE: PC/6804/13

Good Morning,

You are correct, I am to re‐investigate the matter. I look forward to working with you to bring this matter to a

3193