Page 325 - tmp
P. 325

From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto:Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk]
           Sent: 28 February 2017 08:01
           To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
           Subject: RE: PC/6804/13

           Hello Ms Cordell,

           I hope this email finds you well.

           Have you managed to retrieve the transcript from your loft? Or failing that have you a timescale for doing so?
           I appreciate you’ve been ill lately.

           Any issues please do get in touch.

           Kind regards

           Jamie Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards |

           MetPhone 786675 | Telephone 0207 161 6675  | Email Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk
           Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR
           'Setting the bar and upholding standards without fear or favour’


           From: Lorraine Cordell [mailto:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
            Sent: 03 February 2017 10:03
           To: Newman Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk>
           Subject: RE: PC/6804/13

           Dear Jamie Newman

           Sorry for the late reply to the below email the last days I have been up the hospital having tests done due to
           illness, but I will pull out the file I was sent over the weekend as it was put away I think in my loft so will need to
           get someone to go up and get it from my file boxes up there this weekend.

           I will get this over to you as soon as I can.

           Regards

           Lorraine



           From: Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk [mailto:Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk]
           Sent: 01 February 2017 08:40
           To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
           Subject: RE: PC/6804/13

           Hello Ms Cordell,

           Thank you very much for your email, the content of which is very illustrative.

           I can confirm I have made contact with Mr Jenkins and can also confirm according to Mr Jenkin’s recollection
           the officer did not mention their being tools in Simon’s van.

           Regarding the officer’s notebook, as you’re aware the officer did make use of one on the day in question, of
           course its content will form part of my investigation.

           Going forward, I note that in their appeal findings the IPCC made direct reference to a transcript in your
                                                                3303
   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330