Page 664 - tmp

[mailto:Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk]
Sent: 07 August 2017 09:44
To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
Subject: RE: Our meeting today.

Morning Lorraine,

Firstly, apologies for my delayed reply! I had intended to
reply much sooner.

I think I’m correct in saying that the necessity for your
son’s arrest was associated with PC G’s uncertainty as to
the address provided. This is something I’ll discuss in the
report.

Can I ask, from where did you get the impression that
your son’s name was not in PC G’s pocketbook?

To reiterate, I’d be more than happy share documents
with you at the end of the investigation. As per the
Police Reform Act, subject to the harm test. Was there
any particular reason you’d want them sooner? I expect
the investigation to conclude in October incidentally.

I was intending on giving PC G three weeks, what are
your thoughts on that?

Re PC G’s current occupation, I can assure you it would
have no bearing on this matter whatsoever.

Kind regards

Jamie Newman | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit
(SMIU) | Directorate of Professional Standards |
MetPhone 786675 | Telephone 0207 161 6675 | Email
Jamie.newman@met.pnn.police.uk
Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road,
London, SW6 1TR
'Setting the bar and upholding standards without fear
or favour’

From: Lorraine Cordell
[mailto:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 31 July 2017 17:43
To: Newman Jamie M ‐ HQ Directorate of Professional
Standards <Jamie.Newman@met.pnn.police.uk>
Subject: RE: Our meeting today.

Dear Jamie Newman

Thank you for the update email and I also hope you are
well, can I ask a few things please now that you have
had time to go over the documents and information.

Regarding PC G notebook is my son's name at the top
and has it been checked if a radio check was done on my

3642