Page 445 - 2. 2013 New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 445
Hi Lorraine
Further to our telephone call I am returning the email that you forwarded to me. I will require the
original receipt that I can photocopy. I assume that there are no issues re the catalogue links. I will
send over an amended defence case statement that Simon will have to sign before I can serve
Josephine
On Sep 11, 2013 9:53 AM, "Lorraine Cordell" <lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
Hi Jossey
Really sorry I forgot yesterday after I helped Sheila out, I was so tried. Here is the information you
need. Also did you ask the police if you can have access to the building to take our own pictures?
Lorraine
From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]
Sent: 10 September 2013 12:42
To: Lorraine Cordell; too smooth
Subject: Regina v. Simon Cordell at Woolwich Crown Court
Dear Simon / Lorraine
Can you please scan over to me the receipt and the links for the catalogue as referred to in the defence
case statement in order that I can serve this document today?
I have discussed what happened with your case yesterday Simon and it is clear that there has been a
total breakdown in the relationship between you and the instructed advocate. Michael has approved
the immediate removal of your case from Mr Lemosa's diary and I will instruct the Advocate who
represented you for the bladed article case. I am sorry that you were disappointed with the instructed
Advocate. I hope that the above is a satisfactory solution. Can you please keep me updated as to any
additional concerns that you have regarding any future instructed advocates?
Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any further problems.
254
Regards
Josephine
PS Please ensure that you provide the receipts and the links by return email as the defence case
statement should have been served yesterday.
2
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
109. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Case
/ Page Numbers: 255
From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 24 October 2013 13:13
To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD'
Subject: RE: Simon Case
Hi Josey
I just got a call from Simon and it seems that the prosecution have seemed to not have the CCTV the
judge has also allowed this to go on without it and the prosecution not saying what happened correctly
at all in how it was meant to have happened and without the CCTV to prove it how can Simon prove
that they are saying is wrong?
Also, there is no one from there side that has tuned up they are just using their statements. And also,
there saying this is a 2-day trial so want Simon back there tomorrow again this is a lot of money to get
up there and back.
Lorraine
3
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
110. JOSEPHINE WARD _Re_ Simon Case
/ Page Numbers: 256
From: JOSEPHINE WARD [josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]
Sent: 24 October 2013 16:20
To: Lorraine Cordell