Page 541 - 2. 2013 New 26-05-21 No Table

and the reasons as to why both cases have been linked together by the insurance company. Also,
where is the insurance claim for the items within the warehouse that was meant to have been taken as
so far, I can only see a claim for the damage to the building?
Any claim would need to include a list of the items that were taken and would need to be replaced.
Someone cannot just come up with a figure of a cost for items that were taken and so far, it seems as
if that has what has been done in both cases
Feb 2013
And
May 2013.
Lorraine / Simon
From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 28 November 2013 19:54
To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD'
Subject: RE: CPS response to secondary disclosure and confirmation of conference
Hi Josey
317,
Thank you for the email I just got it so will let Simon look over this tomorrow. Can I ask something
the receipt from LiLo Leisure is that the receipt for the?
16/02/2013
or the
04/05/2013
as it seems to be the same receipt. What we want is a full list of items and amounts that were taken on
the
04/05/2013
and also, the same for the
16/02/2013
someone can’t say an amount in £s of damage and items were taken yet not have a full list, or are they
saying on each of the receipts for the
04/05/2013
and the
16/02/2013
all of the items listed on the receipts were taken it does not make sense as they seem to be the same
receipts. There are also no invoices for the repair of the damage on the
16/02/2013
or the
04/05/2013
for someone to come up with the amounts that they have for the damages to this so-called building on
the
04/05/2013,
Which he would have had to get invoices for his insurance companies. Also, there is no information
as to really anything for the
16/02/2013,
And no information as to the people that were arrested and what happened to them. There is also
nothing to show any work was carried out on the building from
16/02/2013
so, show anything was fixed as I am sure there should have been. There is far too much data that is
missing. And I wonder why how can a police officer not have any full lists of items that were taken
yet be able to have a total amount of damage that were caused how could they come to these sums?
There seems to me a lot in this case is being covered up by the police and I would like this addressed
as how can someone have a fair tail without the full facts.
Lorraine
318,
From: JOSEPHINE WARD [Mail To:josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]
Sent: 28 November 2013 17:30
To: too smooth; Lorraine Cordell