Page 59 - 3. 2014 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 59
for. I have attached the page for the PNC print out the police did for the case at Woolwich
crown court that I am on bail now for. This print out was done by the police on or around the
26 June 2013
for the Woolwich case. I do feel this is causing me problems with my bail and I am therefore
asking for this to be dealt with as fast as possible in order that I can show the court this
should in fact not be on my record. I was told on the
10/02/2014
when I called that if I ask for a court transcript that this could be done faster than updating the
PNC records and I would be able to show the Judge at Woolwich crown court the court
transcript for the case that is on my file in error and that should be enough to prove that it
should not be on my record. I am there for asking for the court transcript to be sent to me if
there are costs for this please email me back with the cost for this to be sent to me and I will
get this paid to the court. Please see attached file for the page in my PNC record which is
there in error I have highlighted the case. If this can be done as a matter of urgency due to the
impact this is having on my life.
Many Thanks
Mr Simon Cordell
DOB 26/01/1981
10
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
211. JOSEPHINE WARD Legal Representation
/ Page Numbers: 489,
From: JOSEPHINE WARD [josephinewardsolicitor@gmail.com]
Sent: 12 February 2014 13:12
To: too smooth; Lorraine Cordell
Subject: Legal Representation
Lorraine
Just by way of update, neither Jemi nor any other Counsel will deal with Simon's case
without a solicitor being instructed.
Regards
Josephine
11
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
212. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Regina v_ (27)
/ Page Numbers: 490,491,
From: Lorraine Cordell [lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 12 February 2014 13:56
To: 'JOSEPHINE WARD'
Subject: RE: Regina v. Simon Cordell for mention at Woolwich Crown Court on
Hi Josey
Thank you for the update I understand now as to the section 35. Simon has just got here as he
is due to have a meeting at 3pm today with a next solicitor; he has read the emails and asked
me to write this to you. If you are still willing represent him then he is fine with this, as he
was only upset due to him believing things was not being done in time and him believing this
would impact his life for longer. As he said the other day, he is sorry for the disagreement
that happened on the phone. If you could let him know how you feel about this before 14.30,
he would be grateful.
Simon / Lorraine