Page 606 - 4. 2014 2nd half New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 606
by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This
email has been certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically
logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.
6
The Enfield Gov / Email’s Issue:
403. Lorraine Cordell _Re_ Simon Cordell Section 9 statement for court
/ Page Numbers: 1191,
From: Lorraine Cordell
lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
Sent: 27 November 2014 16:40
To: 'Martin Jenkin'
Subject: RE: Simon Cordell Section 9 statement for court
Hi Martin
Definition of an ‘admissible witness statement’ To be admissible (allowed) in court section 9
of the Criminal Justice Act (CJA) 1967 states for a witness statement to be used as evidence
in any criminal proceeding, other than committal proceedings, it must:
• Be a formal written document of a person
• Be a set of facts relating to a certain event, or events
• Be signed by the person who makes it, to confirm that the contents of the document are
true, this is known as a statement of truth, and have had a copy served on the other parties
before the trial. If all of the above apply, the witness does not always need to attend the
trial to give oral evidence. But once they have made a written statement, they may be
called on to attend court and give their evidence in person. The jury do not see witness
statements so the evidence contained in them will either be read out by counsel or be
given orally by the person who has given the statement. When you can produce a witness
statement as evidence in court to be admissible in court, evidence must be relevant to a
fact which has to be proved, or disproved. Every fact, and document relied upon in court
must be proved by admissible evidence. You can produce a witness statement as
evidence in court when:
• The relevant conditions in section 9 of the CJA 1967 are met:
• This allows the defence to agree to a statement being read at trial where it has been served
in advance to them. For more information on the act, see related link.
• Section 116 or 117 of the CJA 2003 applies:
Please see the government link:
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment
data/file/257982/Witness-statements.pdf
The banging Started!
Debbie Andrews (responsible)
Stain Curtis (responsible)
Mathiyalagan (Responsible)
Time: All-Day and All-Night whenever they knew that I was indoors!
There is not the right amount of justice in this country, if I keep getting disbelieved when I
am saying the truth!
The Enfield Homes and the Enfield Council staff aloud the tenants of 117 and 113 and 111
Continued to victimizing me by
Victimizing me by Banging above the Barth to which I get into, once they understand that I
have ceased running the dihydrogen monoxide for my bath to be yare, this is after they wait