Page 37 - 5. 2015 New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 37

4th I do not feel I should need to do. KGM have in fact not followed the protocol for the
               Subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998 which has been put in 3 times
               already to KGM, I will be addressing this with the Information Commissioner’s Office as I
               do not see any reason you would have to stop the information I have asked for under this act
               to prove I was not in fact guilty of no insurance. And now say to deal with this you need
               information from me. I can understand you want the information for the complaint that has
               been put in, but not the information I asked for to show I was in fact I was insured for an
               appeal that is ongoing. And in fact, would not have been ongoing if the Subject access
               request under the Data Protection Act 1998 as I would not have been found guilty. I would
               like the data sent to the court as soon as possible in regards to this so they can look at the
               facts and see if fact I was insured so there should be no need for the appeal to go ahead with
               more of my time wasted going to court.
               Regards
               Simon Cordell
               From: Austin, Andrew [Mail To: Andrew.Austin@canopius.com]
               Sent: 21 January 2015 11:54
               To: 'Lorraine Cordell'
               Subject: RE: MT3574694
               Dear Mr Cordell
               Thank you for your email. My letter dated 22/12/14 requests the following documentary
               evidence from you with regards to any losses that may have been incurred as a result of the
               above, I confirm as detailed in my previous letter, I require the following:
               1263,
               1. Confirmation of the points you raised to the Financial Ombudsman when you verbally
               submitted your complaint and the outcome you are looking to achieve.
               2. Full details of the losses that you have incurred as a direct result of your complaint and full
               documentary evidence supporting this.
               3. Confirmation of dates of any convictions or costs imposed directly as a result of your
               complaint, including full documentary evidence supporting this.
               Once I receive all of the above, I will be happy to consider this further. With regards to your
               subject access request. My letter of the 9/12/14 advised the following: Following our initial
               investigations we note that you submitted a subject access request to your Broker. Should you
               wish to proceed with this, please can you formally request this in writing to our Data
               Protection Officer at the address detailed at the foot of the letter including a cheque payable
               to KGM Insurance for the sum of £10.00. Alternatively, you may wish to wait until our full
               investigations have been finalised. Can you please confirm how you wish to proceed with
               that request? Should you not be in receipt of any of the letters I refer to above, please advise
               me and I will ensure copies are sent to you immediately.
               I await your reply
               Andrew Austin
               Deputy Underwriting Operations Manager | KGM Motor Insurance
               Member of the UK Specialty Division of Canopius Group
               KGM House | 14 Eastwood Close | London | E18 1RZ
               From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
               Sent: 21 January 2015 11:31
               To: Austin, Andrew
               Cc: complaints@lloyds.com
               Subject: RE: MT3574694
               To Whom It May Concern:
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42