Page 629 - 5. 2015 New 26-05-21 No Table

the police left but due to the state Simon was in the assessment team felt it better to leave and
not upset him any more than he was already due to what the police was doing just keep
turning up at his Flat for no reason. The assessment team went to Simon Flat the next day
with no luck to getting to see him they spoke to him at the door but Simon would not open
the door, they could clearly see he was not stable at all and did not want to push it. So, left he
kept saying the police just need to leave him alone he not done anything and was not leaving
his flat. The assessment team left it around a week I think before they tried again this time
Simon did let them in and spoke to them this was on the 25/11/2015
1810,
On Friday the 12/12/2015 the police went to Kemp hall committee centre looking for Simon
again. And they still pop up now and then just to keep him at a low and not feel safe. The
police know full well what they are doing and know they have been breaking the law. I would
also like to address this issue as I know this is going into court tomorrow re discloser. I want
to seek an injunction against the Met Police under the European Convention on Human
Rights. I want an application to put in tomorrow for High Court for an interim order under the
Protection from Harassment Act, Article 6 of ECHR is a person's right to a fair hearing. If
information is withheld from the court that would show your son is innocent with the
intention of causing a guilty verdict to be returned, that is perverting the course of the
justice/conspiracy to pervert the course of justice and, quite possibly, misconduct in public
office/conspiracy to commit misconduct in public office on the part of those involved, if
police officers, local government officers, civil servants, government officers. Where a
verdict or decision is made by a court as a result of pertinent information being withheld and
which no court or judge would have made had that pertinent information been made
available, the verdict/decision is said to be perverse. It also goes against natural justice. Any
public authority or person whose function is known to be public, like a police officer, who
acts in a way that is incompatible with a person’s rights under the European Convention on
Human Rights, acts unlawfully according to Section 6(1), Human Rights Act 1998. The other
day, I reckoned up the breaches of ECHR against your family by the Met Police. They have
violated at least 22 different rights under ECHR. I suspect there are multiple violations of
these rights. It is one of the worst cases of human rights violations by police I have come
across. If this were to be revealed in an open court, Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe would be
forced to resign or be sacked. His position would be untenable. There is also evidence of
repeated racial discrimination and profiling, as well as harassment. This is what they are
doing by withholding the information from the public order unit at Scotland Yard also known
as National Public Order Intelligence Unit. And the Judge needs to know this tomorrow.
Under Article 6 of ECHR is a person's right to a fair hearing. Discloser should be given if the
discloser they are trying not to give would cause a guilty verdict in this case it will. And I
have a lot more information that needs to be added. Under the ECHR rules that the court must
look at. The fact is the police have it on their systems that these dates was not Simon but due
to how much the police hate Simon and my family they have made up statements that will
found him guilty knowing that not to be fact. They are using CADs from a next party they let
go on yet Crown Road parties had been going on for months. And add all the CADs from
these parties to the one they are saying Simon and Tyrone set up knowing this is not fact.
And again, setting my family up when they have this information at the public order unit at
Scotland Yard as to who set this party up and all the others. If this does not show how much
the police hate my family, I don't think nothing else will and they are getting away with it and
nothing is getting done all we are told is Simon is going to get this ASBO there is nothing he
can do but grass up people to show he did not do this why should he have to give names out.
The police already have them. The Burglary from 2013/2014 the police let a person get away
with insurance fraud, they pined everything on to Simon but new in the Feb 2013 police