Page 788 - 5. 2015 New 26-05-21 No Table

Now I got very upset as I knew I had filed the statutory declaration for this case and seeing
the conviction date this was clearly wrong as I had filed the statutory declaration after this
date. I made a call to the court and was told that the statutory declaration filed in error and
was closed, so was never reopened. The lady I spoke to said she was going to get the file out
and get the right person to call me but give me an update call just to let me know it had been
done.
I then got a call from a lady called Donna and while on the phone to her the other lady called
me from the court to say it had been done. I told her I was on the phone to Donna and she
told me that is who I needed to speak to.
I was shocked to hear the lady say to me that the case was heard on the 18/12/2014 and I was
found guilty again as I did not turn up, but I have had no letters so how was I meant to show
up when I did not know I needed to. But this cannot be right as looking at the information
DVLA hold it is the old information to the 1st hearing, as far as I have been told by the court
when a statutory declaration is filed the court would have to contact DVLA and remove the
old conviction they had on file this has not been done by the court. so how could the case
have been heard on the 18/12/2014. something is really not right here at all as it is all the old
information that DVLA have on file which should have been removed when the statutory
declaration was filed on the 02/12/2014.
I would like this case looked into and set aside and it to be reopened.
I would also like the summons sent to me for this case that was meant to have been sent out
to me which I have never had and the letter of a hearing for the 18/12/2014 could this please
be sent via email to this email address.
Also if the court is not willing to deal with this could you please give me the right to appeal
to the crown court and I will file the correct paperwork to the court.
Could it also be made sure that the right CPS get the files and my insurance policy so it can
be checked I was in fact insured.
And an update as to what will happen as it is very upsetting that I am been found guilty for no
insurance when in fact I do pay for my insurance.
Regards
Lorraine Cordell Simon Cordell
This email was scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by
Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case
of problems, please call your organisations IT Helpdesk.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for
legal purposes.
678,
This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its
unauthorised use, disclosure, storage, or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.
Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and
read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in
response to this message by e-mail.
This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded, and
retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and
e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus
scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate
Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free. Communications via the GSi
may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.