Page 839 - 5. 2015 New 26-05-21 No Table

I was very upset over the way the police officer had lied under oath to the judge and the next
day my mother called Broadsure Direct and spoke to Martin Jenkins he wrote an email to
KGM and got a reply back that an Andrew Austin was going to deal with this matter directly.
My mother sent over to Martin Jenkins what was needed including again the subject access
request from
KGM.
My mother also put a complaint into Financial Ombudsman about what had been going on
and the way in which the insurance company had been dealing with this.
Signed
Witnessed By
252,
On the 30/01/2015 my mother got by email from KGM Peter Wood the audio files for the
14/11/2013 and the 26/11/2013, an email that was sent from the police compound to Kelly
Tiller, and a Letter of Indemnity. The Letter of Indemnity had to be corrected as my mother
wanted all the facts covered correctly the new Letter of Indemnity was sent on the
02/02/1015 by Peter Wood. We got the full subject access request from KGM at a later date.
And on the 09/01/2015 we got a witness statement from Peter Wood.
I had to get a barrister also as this time I did not want anything to go wrong and for me to be
found guilty again when I had done nothing wrong.
The appeal hearing was on the 05/03/2015 at Kingston Upon Thames Crown Court where PC
Geoghegan again lied to the judge in court. But this time we had the Audio and a barrister.
The judge was not happy with what PC Geoghegan did, it was also noted by the court that
there was no notebook, PC Geoghegan statement was not correct and was only a copy and
not dated and also the seizer ticket had been lost. The judge ordered the police officer out of
his court room and not to leave the court building.
I won my appeal Upon Thames Crown Court on the 05/03/2015, this case has caused me a lot
of problems that took over 1 year to address and correct due to what the PC Geoghegan did
that day. He should never had lied and put me under the stress this case has caused me, if
KGM did not record the phone calls I could be on a ban from driving and points on my
license and had a fine to deal with this should never had happened.
There are a number of issues I wish to be addressed for my complaint as follows:
• Areas of complaint.
PC G blatantly lied to the insurance company resulting in his van being seized with a cost of
£190.00 to get it out of the police compound and having to go up and down the compound to
proof to his insurance he did not have any tools in the van, his insurance company was going
to cancel his insurance policy that a lot of money had been paid PC G tried to void his
insurance which I believe is corrupt and improper practice of any police officer.
Unlawful seizure of van which cost £190.00 to get it out.
Unlawful arrest I should never have been arrested as I had not done anything wrong, I believe
this is Unlawful Imprisonment as he used false information knowing it to be false to arrest
me.
Forced to sign a ticket for 6 penalty points on driving license and £300 fine, on top of this I
was later found guilty in a court and banned from driving I believe over a £700.00 fine and
points on his driving license all because PC G lied.
The inspector that came to roadside due to my son asking did not do his job as if he did, he
would have seen there were in fact no tools in the van and this issue could have then been
addressed. But the inspector failed in his duties to do his job, as he only wanted to hear what
PC G had to say and not the real facts of the case about what his PC G did.
PC G blatantly lied in his statement he wrote about the events of that day he knew what he
had told the insurance company yet failed to put this in his statement as he knew he had