Page 753 - 2015 2nd Half No Table
P. 753

Sent: 15 December 2015 08:32
               To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
               Subject: RE: complaint
               Morning Lorraine,
               A full report covering all areas of complaint has been compiled. The Chief Inspector in
               Lambeth will review the full report and make a decision on what action or sanction is most
               appropriate against the officer. Once his decision has been made, I will notify you and a
               further letter will be sent which includes details regarding your right to appeal should you not
               agree with the outcome. I appreciate the concerns you have raised but will now need to wait
               for the Chief Inspectors final decision before I can provide you with a full copy of the report
               that will explain why certain decisions were reached.
               Many thanks
               Jeanette
               Jeanette Reilly | Police Constable | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU2A) |
               Directorate of Professional Standards
               Met Phone 782253 | Telephone 020 7161 2253
               Fax 020 7161 6798
               Email Jeanette.Reilly@met.police.uk
               Address Empress State Building, 22nd Floor, Lillie Road, London, SW6 1TR
               From: Lorraine Cordell [Mail To:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk]
               Sent: 14 December 2015 12:59
               To: Reilly Jeanette HQ
               Directorate of Professional Standards
               Subject: RE: complaint
               Dear Jeanette
               Thank you for the reply to the complaint. As you have found one of the aspects of the
               complaint that PC Geoghegan lied to Simon Insurance is a breach then does this mean that
               anything that happened after that fact was unlawful? As this caused a huge impact on Simon
               life after that lie happened, he was then arrested due to the lie, had his van impounded to the
               lie, and then was found guilty at the lower court and then had to appeal to prove he was
               innocent. His insurance company was going to close his insurance down and we had to prove
               to them there were no tools in his van and in fact the police officer had lied. I do not fully
               understand the one aspect you have said as that one aspect had a lot to do with what happened
               after. PC Geoghegan even admits in the crown court he had not searched the van. Could you
               please explain to me what this one aspect means?
               Regards
               Lorraine
               2301,
               From: Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk [Mail To:Jeanette.Reilly@met.pnn.police.uk]
               Sent: 14 December 2015 11:13
               To: lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
               Subject: complaint
               Good Morning Lorraine,
               Please find attached a letter regarding the complaint made against police. As soon as I receive
               a decision from Lambeth, I will forward this onto you.
               Regards
               Jeanette
               Jeanette Reilly | Police Constable | Serious Misconduct Investigation Unit (SMIU2A) |
               Directorate of Professional Standards
               Met Phone 782253
   748   749   750   751   752   753   754   755   756   757   758