Page 1411 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

appeal. I will say that the CCTV is for security, but so far has protected me due to
malicious information that has been passed to people, but it was not installed for that
reason but has helped in this the main reason it was installed was due to security.
But since the 14/08/2016 when the police themselves damaged the CCTV camera due to
what they were doing to Mr Simon Cordell, it has not worked. So, at this time there is no
CCTV in operation in the communal area of the block the only CCTV that is operational at
this time is the ones inside Mr Simon Cordell flat itself. When Mr Simon Cordell was on a
phone call to Sarah Fletcher on the 22/11/2016 she did say if the CCTV camera was facing
Mr Simon Cordell’s front door there would be no problem with that this is at this time
being acted on.
It also seems that this complaint has come in very late as if any neighbours felt that this
was an invasion of their privacy why was this not acted on in 2013 when it was installed?
Why has it taken them until 2016 to say they feel this is an invasion of their privacy?
In fact I feel it has protected Mr Simon Cordell’s neighbours there has been crime in the
area and many break ins within the housing estate where everyone lives, yet not one person
has been effected in the block Mr Simon Cordell lives in by crime and I believe this is due
to the CCTV being there, and if anything happened to any of the neighbours in the block
the police could obtain a copy. The CCTV camera does not show any neighbours living in
the block, front doors or windows. And only showed part of the ground floor communal
area leading up to Mr Simon Cordell’s own front door.
It also makes us feel the only reason that the neighbours have now said about the CCTV is
due to what they are trying to say about Mr Simon Cordell in these complaints, I feel that
at this time the CCTV is the thing that protected Mr Simon Cordell against what the
neighbours have alleged, why else would it have taken them over 3 years to say they now
felt it was an invasion of their privacy?
As said in my formal complaint the police don’t like Mr Simon Cordell and this has been
for many years when the police go to Mr Simon Cordell flat he feels safer that the CCTV is
there as it shows what the police are doing to Mr Simon Cordell so makes him feel safer,
has the police put a report in about the CCTV camera also?
As stated these allegations are very serious and I would like them addressed as soon as
possible but until I have the information I have asked for so know what dates and times
these complaints were put in I feel that Enfield council is only taking one side to this and
that is the neighbours, as since 2014 all my calls and emails and letter about my complaints
re the neighbours Enfield Council has done nothing to help me or Mr Simon Cordell
address this.
Mr Simon Cordell feels he has no option left to him but to move away from his home due
to what has been ongoing for a long time with no one addressing it. He feels that is the only
way he will feel safe again from what the neighbours are doing to him, yet Enfield Council
have said they will do nothing about this to help him and while this is ongoing it is
affecting his heath more and more.
3

28,
14/12/2016
24/11/2016
24/11/2016

The Enfield Councils History
FOI Indexed