Page 1734 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

- The case took over a year to deal with as the CPS would not give the discloser that my
solicitors was asking for and the judge ordered them to give.
- After a year and on the day the trial was due to start the Judge discharged the changes
and found me not guilty in July 2014 this was before the trial started.
- In this time my brother had a life changing accident.
- My Nan was diagnosed terminal and passed away 30/08/2014
- A close friend of the family passed away in Dec 2013
- A close friend of the family passed away May 2014
- A close friend of the family was diagnosed terminal and passed away on the
29/08/2014 the day before my Nan.
➢ Adjustment Disorder order means there is an event in your life one that you are not
coping with. I admit that I had multiple things going on in my life but none that I was not
coping with and I would not call this Adjustment Disorder.
➢ The facts are that the police knew that I could not have done what they were saying is, the
errors on the police PNC database caused me to go to prison, and I feel victim to the way
in which I was being treated
➢ by the courts, because of what was being told to the judge by the police and CPS, this is
also inclusive
➢ of the period of time leading to how long the case was taking due to myself not getting
discloser from the police after the judge ordered it, we did not get disclosed until the trial
date,
➢ The reason why the prosecution would not give discloser was it because they knew that
by giving me it they would have got the case dismissed much earlier and this is what did
happen in the end, for reasons such as the information I and my family had obtained.
➢ I could not do anything with my company and lost loads of contracts due to the bail
conditions that I was under knowing and I knew that I had done nothing wrong so to be
put under these conditions,
➢ I lost my long-time partner due to this due to the wrongful facts that the police claimed.
➢ Relating to a diagnosis of an Adjustment Disorder F35.2 in 2014, I Mr Simon Cordell
also question the truth of this statement and understand it not to be true, as to the events
that took place on the date did not relate to such a diagnosis.
➢ I am again very concerned and unhappy with the following information being in breach of
my rights that on the 11th /3/2014, it has been said that I Mr Simon Cordell was assessed
by the DR Jarvis of the Enfield Triage Team this is said to be after a referral by my GP
and while in that meeting I strongly disagree with the following:-
• I was not suffering from any symptoms, anxiety for nine months as stated due to being
Mentally ill, as for the truth being that I was feeling that the duration of time, leading
towards the on goings of the court case, up and till the conclusion of the ongoing, was
having an effect on my way of life, until I was found not guilty.
• My Doctor did not refer me to Dr Jarvis, as to in reality, I personally arranged the
meeting and went there of my own free will and told my doctor what I had planned to do.
• I clearly was not suffering from a diagnosis of an Adjustment order, due to being correct
and not been found guilty in regard to the issues I was having at the time.
Dr Rosemary Mills Report:
1734
832,
Report - Reply.pdf
On the 19/11/2016, it is said that I was referring to the home treatment team; this was due to
concerns, that I Mr Simon Cordell had become paranoid about my mother. I question the
following: -