Page 1790 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

mother who had witnessed all of this tried to explain to my barrister what I wanted to say
about the disclosure not just being the schedule and asked Mr Locke to explain what the
schedule is. I also wanted to ask him questions about my human rights in regards towards the
two article sixes referring to the rights to a fair and speedy trial that had gotten handed to the
court on two different earlier hearings to which Mr Andy Locke had not seen before as he
was not present at the past couple of court hearings. He explained that the schedule was what
the judge had asked for on the 04/04/2016 my mother replied this was not all the judge had
asked for. Without replying Mr Locke walked towards the courtroom, we followed, and it
was at this point I said to him I think that I should represent myself because I was not being
heard. On entering the court, Andy Locke addressed the Judge and said I did not want him to
act for me. The Judge informed Andy Locke to remain in the courtroom, the judge asked
what the case got listed for and the CPS addressed the Court and answered, they said to the
judge that I had been sending letters to the court and CPS myself, this is not the case and I did
not understand their comment. I then addressed by the judge and to his questions I replied
yes, I wanted Andy Locke to be my barrister; I wanted time to speak to him so for both of us
to each be clear about the reasons that I had asked for the case to get relisted due to non-
disclosure. The Judge then addressed my barrister who also replied to his questions and said
that he would still act as my barrister for me, the judge noted down that all issues between me
and barrister where happy dealt with and continued to say that he was not the best person to
be hearing this case and passed it over to your good self. On leaving the courtroom my
mother me and my barrister went into a side room to talk, my mother and I explained that a
letter had gotten handed to you on the
04/04/2016
he said he recognized nothing about this letter, so we handed it to him to read. Once he read
this, he said he realized nothing about this and had only seen one document that kept saying
“I Simon Cordell” to which I am not sure of what letter he refers to, my mother continued to
explain that the letter handed to himself by Simon is why he wanted to talk to you before
going into court, as this is an important part of the disclosure proving he's innocent in the
case. He explained he only knew about the schedule to which my mother and I were
concerned about as we understand this not to be all. Mr Andy Locke also asked me if I
had dismissed my solicitors which I replied no. My mother then made a call to my solicitor
and enquired., as to what your good self-had ordered for disclosure. Ms Ward stated she
could not remember my mother being dumbfounded by this said you was sitting in the back
of the courtroom, taking notes, and only last week said to me, again we should have
everything that the judge had asked for in his original disclosure, plus; what got asked for in
Simon’s letter and also the judge had made other addictions… at no point did Ms Ward ever
make me understand she did not know what was due to get disclosed, had she done this I
would have asked her to re-list this to the court and asked for this to get clarified. My mother
then handed me the phone to my solicitor I asked her if she knew about the letters That
earlier, Mr Andy Locke had told myself. I sent to the court and the CPS "on my own" that I
had not sent. When continuing to talk with my solicitor on the phone I believed that I was in
the know-how of the understanding that we was both still thinking and talking about the same
thing and that being of the concept of the letter requested by you and in return handed back to
yourself the judge your honour, on the date of
04/04/2016
which I had already agreed for you to be in receipt of, on this occasion my mother was once
again present and my solicitor was also in court so she recognized about this letter also of the
fact that I had not drafted it alone.
It was at this point I said she was incorrect if she had said that I had pre-drafted the letter
from start on my own as I had only amended it, she then said she did not draft the Letter and