Page 1846 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 1846

Your Honour
                                    26/09/2016

                 As you were made aware at the mention hearing on
                 the 22/09/2016 there is inaccurate data being held
                 in my sons Simon Cordell PNC record, there are
                 also errors in police officer’s statements regarding
                 my character within the Respondent case. I was
                 very concerned that a court has once again been
                 able to see this inaccurate information and when
                 made aware of the errors did nothing to rectify
                 them. I called a helpline on the 23/09/2016 and
                 explained about the inconsistencies on my PNC and
                 the errors in the police officers’ statements I was
                 informed the ICO could address this matter while
                 the case was still being heard and was told to put a
                 form of concern into the ICO. I have now done this
                 and believe you needed to be made aware. I believe
                 my son’s reputation has been diminished in this
                 court and previously in the magistrate’s court and
                 am under the assumption this is a beach of my son’s
                 human rights, am I correct in my assumption?
                 My son when this case started was refused legal
                 aid; this was overturned by a judge sitting at the
                 lower court due to these facts. The importance of
                 what is at stake, the complexity of the case, the
                 capacity to represent himself effectively. On the
                 21/09/2016 when you removed my son’s solicitor
                 from record the protection above was removed, you
                 are aware my son cannot read and write effectively
                 to deal with this trial. At this stage I would also like
                 to draw your attention to your letter that was dated
                 22/02/2016 and section 4
                 "4/ The Court will not and does not accede to any
                 application for the Appellants Solicitors to come off
                 the record or to cease acting for the Appellant Such
                 an application was dismissed by His Honour Judge
                 Morrison on the 19th February 2016. If any attempt
                 is made to repeat this application the Court will
                 require it to be made in person by the Senior
                 Partner of Michael Carroll & Co"
                 On dismissing the solicitors who was acting for my
                 son and not allowing them to be replaced I believe
                 his rights to a fair trial were removed at this stage.
                 Guide on Article 6 of the European Convention on
                 Human Rights Effectiveness of the legal aid
                 granted:
                 The State is not accountable for the actions of an
                 officially appointed lawyer. It follows from the
   1841   1842   1843   1844   1845   1846   1847   1848   1849   1850   1851