Page 25 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table
P. 25

I believe that is the reason a Noise Abatement Notice can be served on occupiers / Buildings
               under Environmental Protection Act 1990 section 80
               Regards
               Lorraine Cordell
               From: Ned Johnson
               mailto:Ned.Johnson@enfield.gov.uk
               Sent: 11 January 2016 12:17
               To: Lorraine Cordell
               Cc: Andy Higham; Robert Oles;
               Theresa Dodd
               Subject: RE: RE FOI 11845 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
               Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
               Dear Ms. Cordell,
               Thank you for your email; I have rechecked our database and indeed, I did make a mistake
               and missed one complaint which was received by our Residential Noise Team on 20/04/14, it
               was the only complaint received by the Council prior to the ones listed in the FOI response
               sent to
               289,
               you. The officer who received the complaint tried to contact the customer who made it on
               several occasions but was unable to do so and as such we were unable to verify the
               complaint. The next complaint received was then on 18/05/14 as stated in my original
               response.
               We did not receive any further complaints after June 2014 in regard to the Man Building and
               therefore as far as we were aware the matter had been resolved.
               A Noise Abatement Notice was not served on the squatters as we would not have been able to
               verify any names given, if indeed they would have given a name and it would have been
               unenforceable as it is extremely unlikely that we would have been able to take anybody to
               court who was squatting. The line taken was to pursue the owners of the building who then
               needed to evict the squatters and secure the premises, which they did; serving a Noise
               Abatement Notice would have had no effect on the owners as they were already taking the
               necessary steps to stop the problem.
               Yours sincerely
               Ned Johnson
               Principal Officer Pollution Control & Planning Enforcement Planning, Highways &
               Transportation Regeneration & Environment Department Enfield Council
               www.enfield.gov.uk
               Protect the Environment - Think Before You Print.
               "Enfield Council is committed to serving the whole borough, fairly, delivering excellent
               services and building strong communities."
               From: Lorraine Cordell
               mailto:lorraine32@blueyonder.co.uk
               Sent: 05 January 2016 16:59
               To: Ned Johnson
               Subject: RE: RE FOI 11845 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
               Dear Ned Johnson
               I am writing this email due to a FOI request I put in some time ago.
               It has come to my attention that some of the information you have given me in incorrect and
               was wondering if you could comment on this.
               In my FOI request you said that Crown Road information started on the 18/5/2014, but I have
               found newspaper information that this started much earlier than this.
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30