Page 409 - 6. 2016 Diary 1st half New 26-05-21 No Table

Any person who was party to any proceedings or is aggrieved by the conviction, order,
determination, or other proceedings of the court may question the proceedings on the grounds
that it is wrong in law or in excess of jurisdiction.
The court can then be asked to state a case for the opinion of the High Court.
The case stated is heard by at least two High Court judges, and more often three judges sit,
including the Lord Chief Justice. No evidence
173,
Simon Cordell’s Skeleton Argument (2) Pdf
Appeals
is considered, so the hearing consists entirely of legal argument by counsel.
Having heard and determined the question(s) of law, the High Court may reverse, affirm or
amend the original determination in respect of which the case has been stated, or remit the
matter to the justices with the opinion of the court, or make such an order in relation to the
matter as the court may see fit.
Appeals before the Crown Court
The hearing at the Crown Court is an entirely fresh one and, by virtue of section 79(3) of the
Supreme Court Act 1981, is a full re-hearing of the case. The judgment in the ease of R v
Lamb [2005] EWCA Crim 2487 recommended that circuit judges and above should be
dealing with these cases.
Rectification of mistakes
Section 142 of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980 gives the court power to vary or rescind a
sentence or other order imposed or made by it when dealing with an offender, if it appears to
the court to be in the interests of justice to do so. However, this section is intended to rectify
mistakes and applies only to orders made when dealing with an offender in criminal
proceedings. Therefore, this power would only be applicable to orders made on conviction,
rather than on a stand-alone application.
Application for judicial review
judicial review looks at the lawfulness of actions and decisions. An application can be made
for the High Court to consider whether the magistrates’ court has failed to exercise its
jurisdiction properly or whether it has made an error of law, which appears on the face of the
record.
The High Court has the power to quash the order or make a mandatory prohibiting order.
An application must be made promptly, and in any event within three months of the date on
which the grounds for the application arose.
174,
Simon Cordell’s Skeleton Argument (2) Pdf
- Breaches
Breaches by adults
Breach of an order is a criminal offence, which is arrestable and recordable. Prosecutions for
breaches of orders can be brought by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), although a local
authority may also do so by virtue of section 1(1 OA) of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 (as
inserted by section 85(4) of the Anti-social Behaviour Act 2003), which states that
prosecutions can also be brought by:
1. a council which is a relevant authority.
2. the council for the local government area in which a person in respect of whom an order
has been made resides or appears to reside.
The lead officer managing the case should keep the other partner agencies informed of the
progress and outcome of any breach investigation. A particular consideration will be the need
to protect witnesses. The standard of proof for prosecution of a breach of an order is the